this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
243 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37747 readers
299 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here's everything we know about it so far:

  • It will use ActivityPub.
  • It will be a side app of Instagram.
  • It will most likely be called Threads.
  • Your Instagram verification status will transfer over.
  • There will be easy discovery tools in place: Your Instagram followers will be able to follow you on Threads as well (they won't transfer over automatically).

What do you think?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] this@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Nope I'm done with corporate-controlled social media.

[–] biff@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago
[–] lunasloth@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

No interest; I won't be using anything by Meta. If the servers I'm on don't defederate from them, I'll just block the domain.

[–] jadedctrl@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I hope it very much doesn’t get defederated. Meta’s service would have less of a lock-in effect if it could communicate with other servers. The primary reason people stick to platforms like Facebook & co. is that their friends and family are on it; but if they can keep talking to them on a different platform, they’re suddenly much more susceptible to ditching Meta and ditching apathy in regards to privacy.

Be seemingly friendly to Meta and any other social media company that starts using ActivityPub — so that we can get normies to ditch them and join the libre side. :)

(ofc, this position is on a case-by-case basis and hinges on how exactly federation is handled by the service at hand. We'll see!)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] freshhotbiscuits@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

”Meta will be…”

NO!!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Nope. Meta is a blight on the world. Musk, Huffman should buy Meta and start a competition on who can make it circle the drain faster.

[–] Stormyfemme@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

Meta == no deal Zucky boy.

[–] matt@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's no way I'll actually use the platform, but I personally have no qualms with federating with it on my instances so I can communicate with friends who may be using it that haven't made the jump to the current fediverse.

Whether we like it or not, this is most likely the best chance for regular people to be introduced to the Fediverse and hopefully gain a good understanding of it, providing that Meta doesn't hide it from people too much or make it complicated enough that people are "encouraged" to use their platform instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Krafty@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

I hate Facebook and Instagram so thanks but no thanks. I'll stay on Mastodon.

[–] open_world@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

If given a choice between Mastodon (with all its flaws) and anything by Meta, I would always choose Mastodon.

[–] Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Your Instagram verification status will transfer over.

Cool! So everyone can know that i have $15 in disposable income every month and that i paid to dox myself

[–] Zagaroth@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Oh hell no. I never liked facebook much to begin with, and started despising it several years ago. I want nothing to do with anything involving Meta.

[–] Test_User@lemmy.rogers-net.com 11 points 1 year ago
[–] daan@lemmy.vanoverloop.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

I'll blacklist them on my instance.

[–] shakesbeare@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It will use ActivityPub. Doesn't this mean I can interact with the entire ecosystem without ever touching their app (ie from Mastodon or any of them)? Or have I misunderstood the systems in place here?

[–] cih@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Correct, you will be able to do that. Also, a wild example: an Instagram user will be able to comment on a Pixelfed post

[–] mosthated@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago

That's not bad. I don't use Instagram, but it would be nice to follow people that are on other services through their Instagram account.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NexNecis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

I think I'm done with corporate social media.

[–] Dan_Rachevaski@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

Meta .....nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope

I'm only on Facebook just because of family and some IRL friends. My instagram is pretty much dead. And I would not going to join yet another Meta platform seeing how a cesspool Facebook is now.

[–] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They wouldn’t want me anyway.

I’m capable of understanding that companies like Meta only want to profit off my personal information and sell advertising. Regardless of what their PR team says, they won’t value or respect the community. I don’t care what they call it, what software they’re using, or what technical tricks they’ve got to offer. No, I won’t be joining.

[–] YuzuDrink@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meta is in it for profit. So you have to ask what they’re stand to gain by offering a federated service (presumably for free). Do they think they can get free data, perhaps? I have no idea, but it’s tempting to want to block them just in case. Costing ActivityPub maintainers money so you can steal user data to sell for money isn’t exactly ethical…

I’m trying to think generously, but struggle to imagine other ways they might be able to profit off the Fediverse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kresten@feddit.dk 9 points 1 year ago

They'll probably try to deploy 'Embrace, extend, extinguish' on ActivityPub

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thegiddystitcher@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Coming at this from a slightly different angle, as I do use Instagram and it was responsible for helping my YT channel and therefore my business in general take off.

I'm already on Mastodon, so would have no need to use this. However, I've really come to despise IG and find interacting with it to be more of a chore than anything. So an option for my friends and viewers from IG to communicate with me without me having to actually log in over there? I can just stay on Mastodon and run everything from one place? Sounds fine to me!

(pending evidence of good faith as discussed elsewhere in thread)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BorgDrone@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hell no. I can't think of any company I trust less than Meta/Facebook.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Soltros@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It'll be funny watching Elon freak out over it, but no I don't want to participate in Zucks data farm.

[–] Chipsie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aldo@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Butterbee@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Not. A. Chance. I will also encourage my mastodon instance to not federate with them.

[–] sushrit_lawliet@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anything from Facebook or whatever they wanna call themselves is a no-go for me. It’ll surely have a lot of sheeple flocking to it and some people who need the public exposure (brands, influencers etc) but I’m happy away from that kind of a platform. If they do make it interoperable with something mastodon or kibn that would be interesting.

[–] leecalvin@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It says it uses ActivityPub, so yes, interoperable. Though Mastodon has its own quirks and doesn't line up neatly with the protocol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OrthoStice@feddit.it 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hell no. Fuck Meta and fuck Mark Zuckerberg.

[–] Protegee9850@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah. I'm on Mastodon. If they use AcitivtyPub and are accessible, all well and good. But I'm done with the corporate ad-supported web if at all possible, and there is literally no way Meta/Facebook won't try to leverage people's posts/information for advertising.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sphere_au@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

No to anything by Meta/Facebook. The platform that refused to show me what I subscribed to and tried to constantly jam pointless political rubbish down my throat, then effectively disabled my account when I removed my data.

I'm also blocking them if they appear in my Mastodon feed.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago
[–] legion@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Hard pass. The only reason I use Meta at all is because they acquired Instagram, and I'm barely on there as it is (but my family members are).

[–] teflocarbon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Over my dead body. I'd never trust a single thing from Meta. Their track record is absolutely horrific in every way possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DaEagle@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's a No from me, dog

[–] VindianaJones@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

I can't trust big tech to do anything remotely good anymore, after what's happened with... well, basically every single social media platform owned by them. I'm sure I'll take a peek at it but I haven't touched Facebook or Instagram in years for several reasons, so I really don't want to give Meta any more of my attention.

[–] Mindless_Enigma@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's neat to see them using ActivityPub, but I'm really wary of anything created under the Meta/Facebook umbrella. We'll have to wait and see if they decide to act in good faith with this which my biases make me doubtful they will.

Also, if they're using ActivityPub, why would I have to join if I can just loop in with my existing Mastodon account?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spasticeightball@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

I already avoid Twitter, why would I join a Twitter clone?

Not likely in the slightest.

[–] Artanis@feddit.it 7 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not. It's Meta, why would I touch anything Meta? :)

[–] alternativeninja@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lol fuck no. Look how well corporate centralized platforms have worked out.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›