this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2022
5 points (100.0% liked)

General Programming Discussion

7711 readers
1 users here now

A general programming discussion community.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please start discussions that spark conversation

Other communities

Systems

Functional Programming

Also related

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brombek@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

GitHub has reportedly suspended the developer's account.

Microsoft: You're fired! (revokes all "free" services)

[–] miguel@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When you realize that you don't have a GitHub profile; GitHub has profile of you.

[–] mekhos@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Well that's a scary new way of putting it.

[–] brombek@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

git config --global user.name "John Doe"

[–] brombek@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

BTW: I can recommend watching: The Internet's Own Boy The Story of Aaron Schwartz

[–] drone621@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Honestly, good for him. Yeah, I'm sure it was an inconvenience for a lot of people that didn't necessarily do anything wrong, but it's funny how it's an open source "community" when people are profiting off your free labor without even thinking about where libraries came from, but when you need some support and withdraw that gift you're the enemy.

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I genuinely laugh at online "communities" for that very reason.

[–] Thann@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you don't like it when "people are profiting off your free labor without even thinking about where libraries came from", don't use free licences....

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure, but just because you've open-sourced something at some point, doesn't mean you have to maintain it for free forever. If we require that level of commitment, no one is ever going to open-source anything.

[–] fosk@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Then why not relicense it at that point?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In other news, NPM continues proud tradition of being hot garbage.

[–] mekhos@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, I don't know jack about programming, but the Dev was complaining about strong frustrations with NPM 4 years ago already.

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He was also building bombs in his apartment until some of his bomb-making materials caught fire.

[–] mekhos@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes I saw that you posted that further up. I get the feeling you dislike him, but my comment was added to one about NPM and I'm not sure building bombs is relevant on this chain of replies.

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

It indicates a certain kind of personality that calls into question his mental state, surely? Or do you think mental disorders are compartmentalized into "work" and "home"?

[–] Echedenyan@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

https://drewdevault.com/2021/11/16/Cash-for-leftpad.html

Already explained in the last parts of this post.

[–] wintermute@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

good old npm dependency hell...

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I genuinely feel bad for the guy. Got screwed over by corporations freeloading off his work with no chance of ever holding his own against them.

While I don't condone what he did, I completely understand his frustration and why he acted out like this.

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Dig a bit deeper into cryptobro there. This is the guy whose apartment burned down because he had a bunch of bomb-making equipment, some of which caught fire.

He's not an innocent victim of anything.