this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024

89 points (100.0% liked)

News

23267 readers

1826 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

dezmd@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

Congress announces major tax deal to expand child tax credit and revive breaks for businesses (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The bipartisan agreement between the House and the Senate tackles priorities for both parties.

Senior lawmakers in Congress announced a bipartisan deal Tuesday to expand the child tax credit and provide a series of tax breaks for businesses.

The $78 billion tax agreement between House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith, R-Mo., and Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden, D-Ore., caps months of negotiating and pursuing common ground in the divided Congress.

...

The deal, details of which were reported earlier by NBC News, would enhance refundable child tax credits in an attempt to provide relief to families that are struggling financially and those with multiple children. It would also lift the tax credit's $1,600 refundable cap and adjust it for inflation.

The new child tax credit policy would benefit about 16 million kids in low-income families, according to an analysis by the liberal-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “The expansion would meaningfully reduce child poverty,” CBPP wrote. “In the first year, the expansion would lift as many as 400,000 children above the poverty line. 3 million more children would be made less poor as their incomes rise closer to the poverty line.”

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

The new agreement would provide smaller benefits than the monthly payments under the American Rescue Plan.

...

Republicans were motivated to revive some expired portions of the 2017 Trump tax cuts for businesses. The deal includes expensing for research and experimental costs, restoration of an earlier interest deduction, an expansion of small-business expensing and an extension of bonus depreciation, according to a section-by-section summary released by the Ways and Means Committee.

So we're gonna restart a bunch of Trump's tax policies that made it easier for rich people to defraud tax collectors while only bringing back a fraction of the assistance we had been providing to children in poverty? What a great victory for the American people /s

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can't afford a kid, a business, or a house, so fuck me right?

[–] Capricorny90210@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The gov't: yes

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I see no details about the business tax cuts, so I assume they're particularly unpalatable.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's probably something like <$1 billion for child tax credit and the rest of the $77 billion goes to business tax breaks, that's usually how it seems to work.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

Businesses do not need tax breaks.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Still 3 days to the 1st government shutdown

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

If the Democrats don't have the balls to stand up to Republicans now do we really think they'll stand up for anything if Trump wins?

The way they're hanging Trump and Fascism over us like the Sword of Damocles really shows how little they intend to lift a finger to save average US citizens if Trump becomes President again. They're too busy cutting deals with the people who would kill us right now and too busy going "Well they had a majority, and that's how democracy works, and we can't really stop them from making laws that are clearly undemocratic and then using them against the citizenry. Our hands are tied!" They're really saying that if the country wants to vote to end democracy, that's okay with them. They don't want to interrupt democracy in action by getting in the way of ending democracy.

It's not like people like Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell are actually buddy-buddy or anything. Oh wait. /s

They are implicitly admitting that there are no guardrails and they do not plan on being a guardrail themselves if Trump returns to power. Otherwise, why would be so important to stop him "at the ballot box?"

They're admitting that if we wins, even illegitimately, that they will let Democracy fold. What a bunch of giant fucking pussies who are going to let a fascist stomp on the face of their constituents until they die. Why? Because we didn't vote hard enough. The national Democrats won't accept any responsibility for their lack of action leading up to fascism.

I mean, to this day, Hillary Clinton has not once apologized for elevating Donald Trump as a "pied piper" candidate as part of her campaign strategy. She damn well helped him along but blames us for her losing, despite her winning the popular vote.

Just expect more of that, politicians blaming you for fascism when it comes for you.

What a joke.

[–] xhieron@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sir, this is a Wendy's.

Joking aside, what should they have done instead? Nothing? Because that's the alternative. Is your position that these families would be better off if they got nothing instead of anything? The Democrats are making a bet here that they can campaign on expanding the child tax credit. Would reasonable, humane Americans prefer they'd gotten more? Of course, but the divided government isn't a hypothetical: it's reality. We have fascists in government because our moron neighbors put them there, so now we have to deal with them. I don't like it either, but the response can't be to throw up our hands, whine, and then lose when the citizens rightly decide the Democrats can't govern. This isn't a choice between sweeping progressive legislation and watered down half-measures. It's a choice between any legislation and nothing.

The fascists aren't an accident. They're on the Hill because Americans put them there, and even if the Democrats sweep the elections in November, there is no scenario in which they do so overwhelmingly well that all the MAGA lunatics are no longer in government. These pricks are here to stay. And worse, they care a lot more about winning than governing, and this bill is a pretty clear demonstration that that fact is absolutely not true of both parties, and it's not even true of the rest of the GOP, corrupt and compromised though it may be.

Most Americans--myself included--would rather have any improvement to the child tax credit than for the Democrats to engage in the same my-way-or-the-highway bullshit posturing of the QOP. We've seen where the moral highroading and stand-on-principle-until-the-axe-falls bullshit has gotten us. How about some actual government for a change?

[–] zzzz@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

It's almost like there aren't two sides at all...