Isn't this whole thing a bit performative? I mean, dogs aren't inherently more worthy of liberation from the meat market than any other farm animal.
World News
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
Yeah for sure, but, I imagine if 1/5~ people had a cow sleeping on the foot of their bed there would probably be a push to ban beef, it's easy for a lot of people who are exposed to pets to make a distinction of pet vs livestock. It's a whole other thing for most people to extend the empathy they have for pet animals to livestock animals.
I’m super excited for cultivated meats to be a thing I can actually get. All the meat I want without being an accomplice.
It's entirely performative. Dog consumption was more out of necessity in South Korea during and following the Korean War, it isn't a delicacy there, nor did it have cultural importance. The Yoon administration is fascist, with failing economic policies and social regressions targeting women, disabled people, and minorities, so Yoon wanted a cheap optics win and banned something almost nonexistent.
There's no moral or economic reason to ban dog meat and not pork or beef, for example, its just optics for some cheap political capital.
"animal welfare"
YOU CANT FIRE ME, I QUIT
such a shame when the government mandates what people can and can't eat
I'm sure you're really upset that people-meat is banned
eating dog is fun and nutritious