this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
927 points (97.8% liked)

News

23305 readers
5390 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 164 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Bernie should have won.

Fuck everyone who voted for Hillary in the primary to guarantee a trump presidency.

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

It was less that and more the Democratic Party completely rigging the election, and committing election fraud, in plain sight for the primaries.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's also the way baseless smears (he owns more than one home! He once wrote something that, if taken completely out of context, is misogynist!) were amplified by neoliberals. The same neoliberals that would throw a hissy fit if someone mentioned how much Hillary "earned" from speaking to banks and hedge funds.

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago

Or that she said marriage is between a man and a woman. Just ignored that one didn't they(

[–] misophist@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (4 children)

My understanding is that the US primaries are private affairs and the organisations can pick their candidates however they want. The democrats certainly did some unethical shit to snub Bernie in favor of Hillary, but I don't know if Primary shenanigans can qualify as the crime of election fraud (unless some of the states protect their primary elections in the same way they do for real elections).

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No, they can't legally qualify what happened as election fraud, but I certainly qualify it as such.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thalience@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I didn't see any election fraud. Can you explain how the fraud worked?

[–] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't have any specific memories or sources on hand since it was like 8 years ago. So by all means take this with a fairly large grain of salt.

But I'm pretty sure it had something to do with the DNC actively pushing for Hillary and denying Bernie the same resources and privileges guaranteed to other candidates. Like there was a substabtial amount of money that was intended to go to the nominee, but Hillary got it well before the primaries. Also there were the emails that got leaked from DNC execs who were very openly against Bernie and discussing ways to debase him or otherwise get support for Hillary to beat him despite their role as neutral orchestrators in the primaries.

We don't know everything. Really just the email leaks and a few reports here or there. But judging by what we do have it paints a pretty damning picture for what we don't have.

[–] diannetea@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It was a lot of stuff. I'm still mad about it. Of the top of my head: they very quickly got rid of polling locations in places he was polling high in multiple states after they realized he was doing well and people were standing in line to vote for over 8 hours, they lied about stupid shit like the fake chair throwing thing they made up to make it sound like anyone on his side were violent, they ignored the caucus rules in Nevada where he clearly won based on video at the time, there was more, but it's been a long time and this are just a few examples that cross my mind on occasion

There have been a handful of times where I wish I had just written it down because I see the "I never saw/ heard about this" line often enough.

The DNC admitted collision in court, what else do you need lol

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/358389-the-dnc-owes-bernie-sanders-and-all-dems-an-apology/

Now I get that this source is mainly speculative, and dependent on eyewitness account, but with how everything took place in 2015-2016, I fully see the above being a completely valid happening.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JonCecil@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It was a bit telegraphed that she backed away from Obama with promised of party electors after he left office. The r’s appeared to have known as well, because they were attacking her his whole presidency. The dems made a deal with a powerful political block in their party, and the r’s capitalized on it. If her ego would have let her back down, whole different world.

But her ego wouldn’t let her back down, so here we are.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

She's also just a plain ol' rotten Cunt. I'd never vote for that self righteous bitch.

Bernie got screwed. Then we all got screwed by Cheeto chimp.

[–] iesou@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

The DNC fucked him over man. No one wants a real progressive who cares about people as president.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 117 points 10 months ago

i am once again thanking you bernie sanders for saying the things

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 82 points 10 months ago (6 children)

But without Isreal as an intermediary, how are politicians supposed to funnel billions of dollars to their friends in the defense industry?

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And without letting Israel demolish and "resettle" Gaza, how are they supposed to get their hands on all of that sweet offshore gas that the Palestinians aren't letting them have anymore?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You'd think this would make the oil industry actually push for an independent Palestine, but oh well.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 7 points 10 months ago

Nah, they know that an independent Palestine wouldn't play ball. The Israeli government would after stealing the territory, though.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Still plenty of kit needed in Ukraine.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

And how can they justify a proxy genocide against Islam without Israel?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 78 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

Whoever is still claiming that Bernie doesn't speak truth to power anymore hasn't been paying attention for the last month or two. Better late than never to return to being the chief advocate for what the people wants but most of Washington doesn't! ✊️

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Whomever is still claiming that Bernie doesn’t speak truth to power anymore

Who ever claimed that? It's essentially been the man's entire career. If he wasn't publicly speaking up early enough in this case, I'm sure it's because he was bending ears behind the scenes.

Not arguing with you, just sort of aghast that anyone (magas excepted - but we expect their opinions to be trash) would try to claim he's not a true servant of the people.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 7 points 10 months ago

Who ever claimed that?

A SHITLOAD of people.

It's essentially been the man's entire career

True. I didn't say they were right, just that they were saying it.

If he wasn't publicly speaking up early enough in this case, I'm sure it's because he was bending ears behind the scenes.

No doubt about it.

Not arguing with you, just sort of aghast that anyone (magas excepted - but we expect their opinions to be trash) would try to claim he's not a true servant of the people.

Agreed, though I'd add Neoliberals and people who don't have any ideals of their own but still like discussing politics for the tribalism and the mud slinging. Of course, there's significant overlap between these groups..

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

He has been publicly speaking since the start basically.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Whomever is still claiming that Bernie doesn't speak truth to power anymore hasn't been paying attention for the last month or two.

Hasnt been paying attention for the last decade or 4...

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 10 points 10 months ago

You know how neoliberals and their propaganda machine be..

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chocolateo@lemmy.world 68 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Meanwhile congress is slap fighting over who gets to kill the poor

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] RalphFurley@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

I volunteered on his campaigns. Bernie is almost always right.

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 22 points 10 months ago

If I was American I would always vote for Bernie Sanders.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Fuck Israel

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

But if Biden can just ignore congressional oversight, what will this do? Can someone sue to enforce oversight?

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (14 children)

He's currently behind the mango Mussolini in the polls and, other than "at least I'm not the other guy" being a much less effective strategy for an incumbent than a challenger no matter how awful the challenger is, this is the main reason.

Biden may be a corrupt right wing reactionary, but he's not enough of a fool that he's not beginning to realize the fact that he probably has to change course on this or run a very high risk of losing the last fair and open US presidential election.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

i think the executive branches crazy override powers are by design. it needs to be quick to respond to issues of national security or something.

i think it would be nice if there were a process to sue the crap out of parties which are abusing these mechanisms, though im not sure what that would look like.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Congress can override an executive order. But the president can veto that action. But Congress can stop a veto with a 2/3s vote.

So if they controlled 2/3s of Congress they could stop anything he tries to do.

That actually seems pretty balanced.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 23 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Hes been pushing for it for months if not decades.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›