this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2023
5 points (85.7% liked)

Movie News and Discussion

2513 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Servais@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Interesting take. I found it bad even without this analysis, but it's interesting to have an other perspective.

[–] _ed@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah the headline is pure clickbait. The movie can just suck because… it wasn’t good.

[–] w00master@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The real reason? No one wanted it nor asked for it.

[–] newline@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Wow... This review is huge pile of horse shit 😂

I honestly can't take any review seriously that has to do such aggressive mental gymnastics to blame the audience for a movie doing bad. Completely missing the point as well IMO that many of the issues of that movie were that it was a lazy, poorly done retrace of the previous movies.

It was horribly written, just like the other sequels. The Wachowskis aren't good filmmakers, and are even worse at content development. What a stupid article.

[–] fox@beehaw.org -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Animatrix > Matrix 1 > Matrix 4 > Matrix DeZIONized

[–] _ed@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Now I’m going to have to checkout dezion I’m assuming the two are cut together. Probably still pretty ponderous.

Animatrix was fantastic no doubt.