this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2115 readers
1 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Took part in an RGS and the head people all push that Maoism is scientifically the best form of Communism. Can anyone explain this view? Also, the group seems to want everyone to hold this view. Isn't splitting into sub-ideologies hurting the potential for a larger movement?

-a confused newbie.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucien@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Mao considered the Soviet Union to have become revisionist after Stalin's death, and MLM's agree with that assertion.

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I've yet to find an ML who doesn't consider Khrushchev an opportunist; roughly speaking, Maoists believe that Mao's ideas (designed to fit China's conditions at the time, e.g. people's war) are universally applicable, ignoring the material conditions

[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t splitting into sub-ideologies hurting the potential for a larger movement?

If they are dogmatic about it enough to kick out other Marxists id say so yeah; unity between MLs/Marxists/Maoists should be a priority, not trots though.

[–] JoeDaRedTrooperYT@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 10 months ago

The only place where left unity is possible is relief ops and anti corporate activism