this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
9 points (63.6% liked)

Comics

5916 readers
383 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A rare one that makes more sense with heathcliff!

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It happens. Though in another place someone said they found this one more disturbing because he just leaves piles of defeated enemies around. It reads as much more cold and cruel without him in it even though it's still obvious who "he" is despite his visual absence.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@qooqie@lemmy.world

A rare one that makes more sense with heathcliff!

That's often my line, but I think I disagree on this one. For one-- as a Heathcliff reader, it's perfectly obvious what just happened. Second, the star on top makes it very clear what Iggy's talking about. Heathcliff adding ball ornaments is somewhat redundant to all that-- important to show for new readers perhaps, but not essential for regulars IMO.

in another place someone said they found this one more disturbing because he just leaves piles of defeated enemies around.

I love that commentary, but that does in fact capture what traditional Heathcliff is all about-- i.e., the absolute VIP and boss of the suburban animal world.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The Heathcliff of my youth was the town bully. That is seldom shown in the modern stuff.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not quite sure which period you're referring to (maybe when he and Spike were frequently getting in to slugfests?), but I think there's an argument that the way Heathcliff's borderline-automatically respected nowadays is much the result of him being a 'tough' when the strip was younger.

All the birds, people, animals and others sitting around commenting on his daily activities seem pretty in line with that.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Back during the 1980s cartoon era.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Mid-Gately, then.

I hate to say it, but Garfield was arguably more interesting, those days.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It didn't require nearly as many brain cycles back then. Now it makes you think.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago