this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
355 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
2235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Senator Warren calls out Apple for shutting down Beeper's 'iMessage to Android' solution::U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is throwing her weight behind Beeper, the app that allowed Android users to message iPhone users via iMessage,

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

What's the point of asking questions when this community just downvotes? Why even have a forum if it's only use is to.upvote things that agree with your pre established opinions?

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm having a brain fart, what movie is this from again? I remember the scene but can't remember the movie

[–] Torch@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago
[–] LilPappyWigwam@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago (10 children)

Your primary contribution to this conversation is to bitch about how no one engages with you? I see users responding to you but then all you are responding back with is editing your comment to say "thanks for answering"? Idk man... maybe it's your approach to dialogue. Being super dismissive and retaliatory tends to bring downvotes.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Honestly it's hard to see how messages don't fall under the protection of net neutrality.

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean they do, but that doesn't mean a message platform can't platform lock itself.

The ISP isn't discriminating.. that's net neutrality.

I think you might be a bit confused.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It just feels like users being restricted to not having any incoming or outgoing communication across operating systems is discriminating. The reason Beeper's previous and current solutions stopped working is because they started blocking it. If Apple had successfully built a protocol that couldn't be accessed by Android devices then that would be one thing, but they failed to do that and now they're discriminating against otherwise valid connections.

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's a competitive advantage. Nothing wrong with that from a business perspective.

Why should Apple build something to work with Android? That would allow people in Apple's hand to swap. No business reason to do it. Why waste server time servicing a competing platform's user's messages?

Then again, there isn't really a reason why iMessage is a big benefit with RCS, Whatsapp, Messenger, SMS, Signal, etc. exist.

According to the given logic, logic if I reverse engineer Facebook Messenger, I should be able to have my app that talks to FB Messenger users. I would have it until, they block me out. They have a terms of service that likely disallows this usage. They have a right to enforce that.

At the end of the day I could care less about iMessage but can defend Apple's right to be a walled garden if they want, even if I disagree, etc.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 6 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Because controlling what people send between each other on devices they purchased and own is not something that the regular human beings at apple have any authority to do, least not for profit. Something very few people seem to understand these days is that in a functioning democracy it pays to have good Business Ethics, or else your company is doomed to eventually buckle and fall apart.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gila@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Net neutrality effectively ending under Trump might clear it up

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If it accessed the message system directly then it makes sense. They're was one just before it that ran on Mac mini farms.

[–] Arthur@literature.cafe 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Beeper Mini registered your phone number with Apple and connected directly to the iMessage servers. That version was killed after three days of usage. The mac mini farm still works but that's just through an apple ID email address.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 5 points 11 months ago

They're was one just before it that ran on Mac mini farms.

Pretty much every other service ran on what I assume are MacOS VMs, because buying a $3k MacBook for every user would not make sense.

BlueBubbles, Sunbird, Beeper, etc.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I have such a love/hate relationship with my senator.

  • She basically brought the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau into existence, which helps TONS of people not get fucked over by banks and stuff
  • Simultaneously, she tends to support corporatist stuff a frustrating amount of the time, and (similar to how Feinstein was, but not quite as bad) doesn’t really know what she’s talking about when it comes to tech and the nuances involved

Edit: to be clear, this isn’t me doing a “hail corporate” and saying Apple is categorically in the right here - simply that there are a LOT more technical complexities going on here than the (reductive) statement Warren made seems to indicate

[–] generalpotato@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Get the fuck out of here with your nuance. You have no business being on the internet.

/s (in case it isn’t obvious)

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 9 points 11 months ago

If this sparks an interoperability discussion (and actions) in the USA, it'll be ironic for Apple who might escape interoperability in the EU.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Warren, an advocate for stricter antitrust enforcement, posted her support for Beeper on X (formerly Twitter) and questioned why Apple would restrict a competitor.

In explaining its decision to cut off Beeper’s access to its servers, Apple said that it took “steps to steps to protect our users by blocking techniques that exploit fake credentials in order to gain access to iMessage.” It also suggested that Beeper’s techniques “posed significant risks to user security and privacy, including the potential for metadata exposure and enabling unwanted messages, spam, and phishing attacks.”

In addition, Cupertino-based tech giant argued against Beeper’s security, saying it was not able to verify that messages sent through unauthorized means were able to maintain the end-to-end encryption iMessage offers.

Beeper, however, claims it was able to offer the same level of encryption as iMessage uses, but did not put its app through a third-party security audit prior to its launch, which would have strengthened its argument.

As of its most recent update on Sunday, the startup posted that work continues on the outage and it hopes to “have good news to share soon.”

Beeper Mini, then, became an app that focused solely on bringing iMessage to Android for $1.99/month, with the intention of expanding its capabilities over time.


The original article contains 474 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Did Beeper clear its usage of the iMessage platform with Apple? Sign a contract? Get an SLA agreement with Apple in writing?

I was under the impression that they found essentially a back door/work around to latch into the iMessage platform… in that case this is no different than Cisco patching some routers or MS fixing a security hole. If anything I’d be more annoyed that Apple didn’t patch it quicker.

I’d love to be able to use iMessage with my android friends, but Beeper’s methods seemed sketchy as hell.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

It was an exploit that mimicked the device as apple hardware, but it wasent sketchy. Everything was still e2ee, with beeper having no access to any data.

It was the exact opposite of what the Nothing "middleman" did that was actually sketchy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LilPappyWigwam@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've only heard this particular stance from iPhone users.

Apple has done a stellar job propagandizing their brand as the "Good guys... just looking out for their customer's best interests, is all".

No evidence for this take whatsoever; it's just naked, gullible brand loyalty.

Kind of an amazing phenomenon, if it weren't so sad.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’ve got both. iOS for work, android for personal use. I’m in DevSecOps and therefore tend to see everything from this sort of mindset. Apple didn’t make a deal with them, they don’t have an open standard. It’s proprietary, it’s locked down. Why would any company with that sort of a product allow another company to interface with their offerings without paying for it? Even if it’s nice and secure, this will add load to the iMessage servers that people aren’t paying Apple for. It could introduce errors/issues they never tested for because they have a closed ecosystem and only have to test with their own devices, a known quantity. It could even increase potential attack vectors.

If you offered wifi to your friends via a guest network and then someone figured out how to connect their whole neighborhood to it, would you be fine with that?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

What's the choice? Apple isn't going to license it for all the tea in China.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›