this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
162 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

59118 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple responds to the Beeper iMessage saga: ‘We took steps to protect our users’::Beeper, like Sunbird and Texts, sought to find a way to bring iMessage to Android users. Its app, Beeper Mini, worked well. But a few days after it launched, Apple took steps to shut it down.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 83 points 11 months ago

Apple is very good at spinning things like this and anti-repair measures that benefit their bottom line as being in the interests of users. They're so good at it they don't even have to lie; using hardware IDs as part of their anti-spam strategy probably works, and locking down repair probably does reduce device theft.

That's not the world I want to live in though.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 40 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)
[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Apple definitely does, they just think their users are stupid enough to not know the difference.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

~~think~~ know

Your average Apple (or Android) user is dumber than a bag of rocks when it comes to technology.

[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Infinite growth.

They must gain more profit at any cost so their personal shares and shareholders are appeased. Once you have saturated the only next step is exploitation. Push moral boundaries for profit.

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Perhaps I just don’t understand why there is such an allure for Android users to gain iMessage…

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The default OS text messaging apps dominate the messaging space in certain markets - most notably the US. Moreover, Apple has over 50% of the smartphone market in the US.

Sending media from Android to iOS looks like flip-phone trash right now. It’s done via MMS. It’s also not secure.

This will change when Apple starts implementing RCS, but Beeper was a way to start having high quality messaging now.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sending media from Android to iOS only looks like trash on all carriers except Verizon. You can send high quality TO iOS if the network supports it.

You can never send high quality MMS from an iPhone, even on Verizon.

I've tested this many times. I've sent 50mb video from a Verizon Android to a Verizon iPhone, it receives a 50mb video. Send the same video back from the iPhone to Android, and iPhone butchers the quality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] CodingCarpenter@lemm.ee 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No shit everybody in my group uses Apple phones but me and it's a constant bro just get apple and I have to keep reiterating I have no interest in it

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Sounds like your friends are assholes then. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯ I have literally never as an adult had someone go "ew green bubbles." Now, my teenage nephew? The iCult is STRONG with kids.

[–] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The iCult is STRONG with kids.

This is the real issue.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I had women in their 40s express their distaste when I had an Android phone.

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Then they're assholes. Seems pretty simple, no?

For someone in their 40s, they're probably stuck in the iPhone=rich/Android=poor dichotomy that Apple curated when the iPhone launched. That makes them vain and materialistic, and thus probably not people you want to be around if it's that important to them.

Now, if you want to get into how Apple has been changing the contrast ratios on the text for blue and green bubbles to make the green messages harder to read, as well as intentionally making the green color unpleasant, there's something there.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They pretty much just both thought that Android was inferior. Kind of unfair from one, who was a photographer, considering I bought a Galaxy thinking it had a better camera than the current iPhones (it didn't, because the processing and camera app were inferior). So she'd be like "I don't know why you bought that thing.". But she was aware it cost as much as an iPhone at the time.

The other gf was a design snob (worked for a major clothing company as a color designer) and just thought that Android was complicated and tacky. Not that she ever really used it.

[–] Untitled4774@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

It’s the same problem with so much of the issues we’re facing in society people don’t know it so it becomes the “other” and therefore bad.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (10 children)

What is your source on the second paragraph?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's also the fact that there is essentially zero choice when it comes to iPhones. Most people don't care about the tech inside the device, they just want something that works. In the Android world there are so many devices with different specs that it breeds confusion. People buy a cheap Android phone and are like "This thing sucks! Android is terrible!" and go get an iPhone, which works better than the garbage Android device that they used, never trying a top tier Android device like a Pixel or Galaxy.

Back when my mom needed to upgrade her shitty Sharp Aquous Android phone I told her I would pay for it, since she's frugal, she instinctively pointed out the cheapest one at T-Mobile. I told her that it was going to be garbage and she was going to hate it, but she insisted that she wanted that one and didn't care. I bought her a Galaxy S6 instead, which she used for years. When I bought my Pixel 6 Pro, I gave her my Pixel 2 XL, which was still working perfectly 5 years later. She's still using it two years later and has zero complaints.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

They did you a favor by showing who they are.

[–] TK420@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Uhhh, I say ewww green bubbles all the time, except the rest of that thought is, “damn, they need signal”

Fuck SMS, and fuck Apple for fucking this up and not doig the right thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Because iPhone owners are petty and care about the text bubble color.

[–] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Also Apple has intentionally made the Android text bubble less readable, so it has a concrete impact

[–] scidoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

how is white on green less readable than white on blue? please elaborate.

[–] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 3 points 11 months ago

They've chosen the green so there's a much lower difference in contrast between the white and green when compared to the white and blue

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago

The green is lighter than the blue, meaning lower contrast

[–] scidoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

how is white on green less readable than white on blue? please elaborate.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

There are some people that send a lot of pictures over text messages, who want it for the upgraded image sharing quality. That's a sane enough reason, at least.

On the bright side, the kind of people who judge other people for their text message bubble color are not the kind of people I want in my life. So at least it's another asshole filter.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

i just want to talk to my family on a single non meta owned platform... the only ones to join me on on signal are my dad and my wife, the majority have iphones.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’d like to use it on desktop. I have to use windows for work but I have an iPhone. People send me messages on my phone and I have to email pics to myself or use Google drive, and it’s a pain in the ass. Using a Mac shows how much more convenient it is to just have it in a desktop app.

[–] Untitled4774@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

I think the phone link app in windows does integrate iphone messages now too

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] steve_floof@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago

Headline: Apple be Applin’

[–] EvokerKing@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They protected their users because if they didn't they wouldn't have users. I have asked plenty of friends why they don't use Android and their response is "it doesn't have iMessage" and that if it did they would switch.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What's so special about iMessage?

[–] TodaviaTyler@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Nothing. iPhone users are just happily married to it. I have family/friends that would switch to a cheaper non-iPhone that performs just as well if they could keep using iMessage.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

They spelled moat wrong. If Apple followed through with their promise to bring iMessage to other platforms then Beeper wouldn’t need to exist.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Thank you Apple. You’re my hero. 🙄

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“We took steps to protect our users by blocking techniques that exploit fake credentials in order to gain access to iMessage,” Apple senior PR manager Nadine Haija said in a statement.

Beeper says its process works with no compromise to your encryption or privacy; the company’s documentation says that no one can read the contents of your messages other than you.

Apple has repeatedly made clear that it doesn’t want to bring iMessage to Android: “buy your mom an iPhone,” CEO Tim Cook told a questioner at the Code Conference who wanted a better way to message their Android-toting mother, and the company’s executives have debated Android versions in the past but decided it would cannibalize iPhone sales.

But Beeper Mini was exploiting the iMessage protocol directly, which clearly prompted Apple to tighten its security measures.

When I say that maybe Apple’s concern is that iPhone users are suddenly sending their supposedly Apple-only blue-bubble messages via a company — Beeper — they don’t know about, Migicovsky thinks about it for a second.

And Apple has made clear it intends to win that game, no matter how badly you want to send iMessages from an Android phone.


The original article contains 890 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Sounds like more people should use Signal

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

If you can get them to switch, I'd appreciate it.

I had people switching to Signal as their SMS replacement which was compelling for them. Then Signal dropped SMS support and those people reverted.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Or Threema since it’s from my country and we have a good privacy reputation 🇨🇭

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (4 children)

The problem with Threema is it costs money.

It's not a lot of money. It's not an unfair price. It's completely reasonable to expect to pay for services rather than using things that spy on you. None of that matters though. I have a hard enough time getting people to use Signal, which is free; anything paid is a complete nonstarter.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] habanhero@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why so many are rooting for Beeper. Apple's response is 100% reasonable - you have a 3rd party service that's making money by impersonating iOS devices in order to access Apple services. Apple has no way of controlling how many devices will use Beeper and if their system can maintain a good level of service, how these Beeper devices are interacting with iMessage, and whether Beeper is actually keeping iMessage metadata private or just giving lip service.

An analogy would be like Apple is throwing this awesome concert event and Beeper found out a convincing way to fake the tickets, and are actually actively promoting, registering people and profiting off of it. In any reasonable world outfits like this would be shut down immediately and rightfully so.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't understand why people are rooting for Beeper knowing how badly Eric Migicovsky screwed developers on the way out from Pebble Watch.

He already sold a failing company once, and he's already hit a roadblock with his current company. How long until he gets bored and sells this one?

Also, I was on the waiting list way back when, and declined to sign up for Beeper when I had no indication that my onboarding would be recorded. Then I showed up to the onboarding zoom meeting with a note about it being recorded. No advance notice from a service that claims to respect privacy? You just showed your ass, Beeper. I never signed up, and when I wrote them with follow up questions ("How can I trust that the privacy policy will stay the same if the business is sold to another party?") they declined to respond to any questions. Months later I would get an automated email reminding me about my place in line like I gave a shit anymore.

I personally don't trust this companies promises, period. They've made it clear they're less than honest about the privacy stuff and the founders past doesn't scream "He will stand by this company when things get hard."

load more comments
view more: next ›