this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
349 points (98.1% liked)

News

23296 readers
4226 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 94 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Brandon Clay Dotson was found dead at Ventress Correctional Facility on November 16. It wasn’t immediately clear what charge Dotson was serving time for.

It wasn’t immediately clear what charge Dotson was serving time for.

We don't know what he did, but he died in prison over it.

This is fucking terrifying.

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

https://www.moultonadvertiser.com/news/article_a77d0b88-9549-11ee-a04b-3b8f2ec3576f.html

Found a better article. It was a burglary charge. Sounds like he was killed by another inmate.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

It wasn't immediately clear because the journalist is lazy. The scary shit is that dude's heart was removed

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 91 points 11 months ago (4 children)

So they say they don't perform autopsies, and the warden was surprised they wanted the body. Either they're lying about the autopsy or there's some sick fuck just cutting up bodies and taking parts as souvenirs.

[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 85 points 11 months ago

Or the warden got a nice chunk of change for that man's heart.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 32 points 11 months ago

I'd wager that they're selling organs to medical schools and expecting zero repercussions.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Or the cause of death was somehow incriminating and involved the heart, so they got rid of it to destroy evidence.

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

some sick fuck just cutting up bodies and ~~taking parts as souvenirs~~ selling them for big money.

[–] LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works 49 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What the fuck? The headline sounds strange, but the article is so absurd I would find it a bit over the top if it was a movie.

WTF is going on in those prisons?

[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

The law isn't the bunch of nice guys they convince you of with their controlled conditions.

[–] reversebananimals@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

A bunch of good ol boys trying their darndest to re-live the "good old days" of slavery.

[–] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 9 points 11 months ago

Sounds to me like they are modern day resurrectionists for the local med school. I really hope the FDA takes a closer look at the med school's procurement and documentation of human specimens.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago

In addition to prison officials, the lawsuit names the UAB Health System as defendants. The suit claims UAB’s School of Medicine obtained Dotson’s heart, and details a 2018 incident where medical students “noticed that a disproportionate number of the specimens they encountered during their medical training originated from individuals who had died in prison custody within the Alabama Department of Corrections.”

[–] Cap@lemm.ee 34 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I would love to see the follow up to this. To see some sort of justice or reform. Sadly I feel this will change nothing and things will continue to get worse..

[–] reversebananimals@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

It's Alabama. It's never going to get better.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

This kind of story makes me think about superheroes.

[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (3 children)

We need a total and complete shutdown of prisons until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I’m going to upvote you, because I like your anger. But that would probably be a terrible idea to allow convicted killers and rapists out on the street who have not been rehabilitated.

I wouldn’t argue with the possibility of temporarily releasing nonviolent criminals. 

[–] ares35@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

the current system isn't doing a whole lot of 'rehabilitation'.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"convicted"

I was convicted too. Zero evidence because I did nothing, but they just kept delaying my court case and making sure I was miserable. I eventually took their deal.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

How do they avoid having your right to a speedy trial kick in?

[–] bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Bureaucracy

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

It’s a rule for the government. The one who enforces that rule is also the government. That means the rule is, effectively, optional.

[–] YoorWeb@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Rehabilitated? We're talking about the US, not Norway.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We need to overthrow the shitty system and replace it with a new one, is what we need to do.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Every prison should be replaced with facilities for drug treatment, support groups, and job training. Give those people something to do and they won't be a threat to anyone, and that burden on society will disappear in a couple generations because they're not passing it on to their offspring.

But of course that doesn't directly make money for the people who own the system, so good luck convincing the folks in charge to make a change.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I see you haven’t encountered psychopaths yet

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lol obviously there are horrific things happening but you do realize that is completely impossible yes?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why?

They can't stop us all. The only thing standing in the way of good is people who consider themselves good but stand by doing nothing while witnessing evil.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wut

Releasing all prisoners at once is simply the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

[–] grue@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Dumbest thing [you] ever heard" is entirely different from "completely impossible," you know.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Obviously it's "possible" to unlock all the doors and walk away.

Whatcha gonna do with all the actual, legitimate violent criminals who just got dumped back into society all at once?

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Actually no its not possible to do that because if you do that some of the prisoners will become the new jailers.

What I’m saying is that it is not actually possible for everyone to be free, because there are some people who aren’t the government who will actively kidnap and imprison other people.

[–] grue@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Obviously it’s “possible” to unlock all the doors and walk away.

Thank you for admitting you were wrong.

Whatcha gonna do with all the actual, legitimate violent criminals who just got dumped back into society all at once?

How the fuck should I know? It wasn't my idea, nor did I endorse it.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Alright Copernicus, clearly the suggestion that it was "impossible" related to the unacceptable nature of releasing all criminals without review.

Agree that if you enforce childish semantic literalism then yes, I was wrong. But if you have at least two functioning neurons you'd understand quite clearly what was going on.

Assuming you do, that means you intended to be petty, and have nothing to add.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Assuming you do, that means you intended to be petty, and have nothing to add.

You get what you give, buddy.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Refuting a nonsensical idea as impossible is not "being petty". My short response at most was "being curt" or "dismissive".

You are too dumb to be in my life. See ya

[–] Arthur_Leywin@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Welp. That's good nightmare fuel.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 11 months ago

Someone must've gotten hungry.