this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

GenZedong

4186 readers
25 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Video available from the UN at: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1n/k1nebmv8uw

The two-state solution is the only way to fundamentally resolve the Palestinian question, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Wednesday.

When meeting the press after presiding over a high-level meeting of the UN Security Council on the Palestinian-Israeli issue, Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, stressed that the two-state solution is the only way out.

The settlement of the Palestinian question does not lack for grand plans or slogans, but the courage and actions to stand up for justice, Wang said.

"The two-state solution is the bottom line for international justice. There is no stepping back from that. Independent statehood is an inalienable national right of the Palestinian people, a right that cannot be traded away," he said.

"In the face of the historical injustice long suffered by the Palestinian people, no one has an excuse to procrastinate and there is no justification for inaction. When it comes to the issues bearing on the future of the Palestinian people, no country has a veto right," said Wang.

The Palestinian question is at the heart of the Middle East issue and must be prioritized, rather than marginalized, on the international agenda, he said, noting that only when the two-state solution is fully implemented can the Middle East enjoy genuine peace and Israel enjoy lasting security.

China calls for the convening of a more broadly-based, more authoritative, and more effective international peace conference to further build consensus on promoting peace and work out a concrete timetable and roadmap to push for a comprehensive, just, and lasting settlement of the Palestinian question, he said.

Also not included in the news report is this following Q&A at the end of the press meeting:

Q: I was wondering why is it so hard in your opinion for the Security Council (as a permanent member) to condemn Hamas, and since you're here, we're very concerned about the pneumonia cases in China. Are you concerned about opening up the country to foreigners without visa regarding this?

A: Well it is first and foremost up to the people in Palestine to decide how to view Hamas. China always stand firmly against all forms of terrorism, in the meantime we emphasize that there should be no double standards when it comes to opposing terrorism, and such opposition of terrorism should not be targeted against any particular ethnic group or religion.

China has a fully-fledged medical system. Recently we have seen some clusters of flu cases among children in certain parts of China. In fact that is a very common phenomenon in many countries, and in China that has been put under effective control

China's interactions with the international community will not be affected by any factors, and we welcome more visits from friends from across the world, including you.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dmonzel@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I really hate calling it the Palestinian "question". This is a genocide, not an interrogative.

[–] davel@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The X question” is a term of art, often used by Marxists, though not exclusively so: take for instance “the Jewish question.”

[–] dmonzel@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oy vey, totally not where my head was earlier. Thank you.

[–] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 11 months ago

Personally I agree though. Aside from intentional reaction provoking, it feels dehumanizing to me.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm sceptical about two-state solution in 1967 borders. Palestine is split in two part, and one of them is landlocked, it doesn't bode well for development and actual independence. I'm more in favor of one-state solution.

[–] pigginz@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I personally see a two state "solution" as a necessary step towards a free Palestine. What currently exists is effectively a one state solution, with one settler colonial state.

Wouldn't a globally recognized Palestinian state be much better situated politically, economically, and even militarily to both protect the Palestinian people and to continue the fight towards expelling the colonizers completely?

[–] abuttandahalf@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] pigginz@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you think the current situation with effectively no Palestinian state is more conducive towards victory? At what point during the struggle does a Palestinian state get established then? Only at the very end?

[–] abuttandahalf@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What you are saying is exactly what was used to justify the Oslo accords. That path has already been tried and the result of it is the traitorous Palestinian authority that you see today. A Palestinian state that's militarily antagonistic to israel will not be allowed to exist while israel has the power to prevent it, and if Israel does not have the power to prevent it, it will not have the power to defend its own existence. There is no need to keep rehashing this same rhetoric.

[–] pigginz@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Hmm, yeah that makes sense.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

More probable that it would keep on being a bantustan for Israel.

[–] pigginz@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, but I guess I'm thinking that maybe if it's part of some international initiative with China and Russia involved, it might at least be something capable of providing better access to food and water.