this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
415 points (99.3% liked)

Linux

47290 readers
637 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] linucs@lemmy.ml 76 points 9 months ago

Pipewire is a true blessing for Linux

[–] pinchcramp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Official Release Page for those who don't want to read the Phoronix article: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/releases/1.0.0

It's great to see that Pipewire has reached this milestone. Personally I've been using it since 0.3.35 for very basic audio needs and it's been a very smooth transition. After installation I never had to tinker with it anymore. "It just works"^TM^___

[–] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I had to do some tinkering way back to make my bluetooth earplugs be recognized as an audio device.

Not sure if that is still needed today

[–] onion@feddit.de 3 points 9 months ago
[–] Phanatik@kbin.social 52 points 9 months ago

Genuinely one of the best pieces of software that these heroes are giving away.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 51 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've seen so many audio changes on Linux. But Pipewire is the first one without any negatives.

[–] Helix@feddit.de 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it's basically Pulseaudio, but better. The devs have done a great job on iterating upon the already pretty good pulseaudio!

[–] gens@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's more like JACK for desktop. PA was never good, just obvious bad design.

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'd have to disagree with that. It wasn't perfect and there were issues for many people at the beginning, but it united everything properly.

Before then (in xmms days), don't forget that audio in apps constantly didn't work, and the sound servers often conflicted. It was far from a seamless experience.

But, pipewire I agree doesn't seem to have any downsides and finally fixes from what I felt was the last major issue (low latency)

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

PA works on most case tho. Can't deny all the good it did.

Also, is JACK any good?

[–] gens@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago

Didn't work on my last two sound cards, and always had latency problems for many people.

JACK is for profesionals. If you need to take an input from an instrument, run it through a software filter, and output it immediately. Or if you need to output from one program to another to another. Etc. Usually that means small buffers and a lot of cpu usage. Not really for normal desktop users. Grab a specialized distro like ubuntu studio and try it, if you want.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 6 points 9 months ago

Pipewire replaces the need for jack, which was low latency audio routing between audio components. Pipewire even has jack compatible interfaces so you can use jack based apps with it.

Then there's the bit most people skip over. Pipewire does the same thing for video!

[–] waigl@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Pipewire makes me feel like I'm a bit stupid. I keep reading about it, I read the introduction and FAQ on their website, yet I still couldn't tell you what that thing even does. All I know is it's a slightly less buggy drop-in replacement for pulseaudio, and pulseaudio is something I use because Firefox forces me to. (I would still be on plain old ALSA if it weren't for Firefox.)

Also, it definitely did not "just work" for me out of the box, I had to do quite some digging and some very non-obvious stuff to get it to a) start up and b) let me use my microphone. I still don't even know what "starting up" really means for pipewire (is there a daemon or something?), the website likes to pretend that isn't a thing, but without doing some stuff to start it up, audio just won't work for pulseaudio and pipewire applications...

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 33 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The Arch wiki made installing it very painless for me. Zero problems. Install it, remove PA, activate systemd service.

[–] threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 months ago

you can install pipewire directly from archinstall now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

For a long time, people shat all over pipewire and said it wasn't viable as a replacement for the existing Linux audio stack, but clearly that hasn't ended up being the case

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 19 points 9 months ago

I've heard nothing but good, and replacing Pulseaudio was painless. It was Pulseaudio that people hated on in my experience

[–] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 11 points 9 months ago

When it was brand new there were some edge case bugs that broke on certain workflows and hardware, but that's pretty much entirely fixed now and I'm guessing for a long time now it's been more universally stable than pulseaudio was.

Also, some people just pointlessly dislike anything that's new, or because it breaks their spacebar heating

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 13 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It has finally happened: PipeWire 1.0 has been released as this now very common software to the Linux desktop for managing audio and video streams.

With time it's proven to be a suitable replacement to the likes of PulseAudio and JACK while pushing forward the Linux desktop with its modern design and feature set.

PipeWire 1.0 delivers improved time reporting for less jitter in ALSA when using IRQ mode, various module fixes, Bluetooth LC3 codec and compatibility improvements, improved transport and time handling for JACK, optimized buffer re-use with JACK, and a variety of other improvements.

There isn't anything fundamentally different about PipeWire 1.0 but was part of their plan for releasing 1.0 later in the year and finally moving past all the 0.3.xx releases.

PipeWire has proven itself stable and plenty reliable for Linux desktop uses.

Downloads and more details on the big PipeWire 1.0 release via FreeDesktop.org GitLab.


The original article contains 161 words, the summary contains 150 words. Saved 7%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Is there something like the banana voicemeeter for pipewire?

I am currently using Helvum, which is kinda lacking a lot of the functionality.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I was experimenting with the Cadence tools from KXStudio. These are mostly made for JACK, but PipeWire has a JACK interface so it should work. It's similar to helvum, but with more options.
Not sure right now which one (maybe Carla), but one of these programs also support adding sound effect nodes that have their own GUI! You probably want to use it in multi-client or patchbay mode

[–] 7EP6vuI@feddit.de 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

Oh, that's sad news. These are really great tools :(

[–] christophski@feddit.uk 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My audio set up is using jack on Ubuntu. If I were to start using pipewire, does it replace jack? Or do you use it alongside jack? I use mostly ardour, hydrogen, renoise and bitwig.

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Pipewire exposes both a JACK and Pulseaudio client interface, so you don't need to run the JACK daemon anymore.

[–] christophski@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nice! So it completely replaces jackd/qjackctl? Can it sync transports?

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

qjackctl will actually connect to pipewire, I use its graph window a lot to route audio when the default volume control isn't enough. But yeah it does (or can) replace jackd.

Can it sync transports?

I'm not sure, I'm not a pro audio user. Sorry!

[–] christophski@feddit.uk 2 points 9 months ago

Cool, thanks for the info!

[–] mactan@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

big fan of qpwgraph

[–] deur@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago

I believe a problem you may encounter asking this question is the fact pipewire does most of that itself?

[–] imgel@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago
[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Brilliant piece of software

[–] unce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Oh nice! I wonder if this will fix discord streaming audio?

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Nope. This will only be fixed when Discord gets their head out of their ass, unlikely to happen soon.

[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Can you describe the issue? I don't use Discord (and I presume the problem might depend on what browser you use).

[–] Clever_Clover@hexbear.net 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

on discord on linux you can't screenshare with desktop audio, I think this might be already fixed in newer electron versions (but discord is closed source and has not updated their electron in a long time)

[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That absolutely sucks :| Thankyou for the detail.

[–] mackwinston@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

As a workaround, you could use OBS and use OBS's virtual camera so Discord is streaming what it thinks is a camera, and set up whatever you want to share on your desktop through OBS.

[–] unce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I have discord installed from the flatpak. Screen sharing works but it doesn't share audio from the applications. Discord-screenaudio and web browser discord have been suggested to me but they don't work with unfocused push to talk. I've also tried xwaylandvideobridge but that didn't stream the audio either.

[–] peanutbutter_gas@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm assuming this is a "dedicated app" (i.e. apt install discord). I was capable of streaming the video, but sound was a different beast. Audio streaming on discord was a no go. I was finally able to do it with pipewire and using discord-screenaudio

[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 2 points 9 months ago

https://github.com/maltejur/discord-screenaudio

A custom discord client that supports streaming with audio on Linux

Jaysus, I wish this were a world where stuff like that wasn't necessary.

Uneducated question: what's the benefit of a dedicated client over running it in a normal browser?

[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I've been using PipeWire this year on my Void Linux laptop & desktop. It's been mostly OK but has a few problems. For years I have been using plain ALSA (with no custom configuration) because pulseaudio causes me regular issues across multiple machines (mostly silently failing).

Pros:

  • I don't have to use Chromium for my mic to work on online video conf (WTF Firefox)
  • "EasyEffects" lets me quickly fix crappy youtube audio (bad gain normalisation, way too much sibilance) with a minimum of effort.

Cons:

  • Sometimes breaks all audio until I manually restart it (hey, just like pulseaudio. This problem never happens when using ALSA straight)
  • First time setup is complicated, involving environment variables, dbus user session buses and multiple daemons (running just pipewire isn't enough). Why can't it handle this all itself? Surely it should notice if these things are missing and just fix it itself? Compare this to straight ALSA where you (1) do nothing and then (2) everything works (except Firefox mic support)
  • I can't have multiple audio outputs all unmuted at the same time. Eg my headphone output and my rear speaker output. If I override this (using alsamixer) then it gets forgotten next boot anyway, it seems to be out of scope of PipeWire's understanding.
[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
  • Sometimes breaks all audio until I manually restart it (hey, just like pulseaudio. This problem never happens when using ALSA straight)

Well, how much lennart is in this thing? Not only can that predict how well it's going to work, but also how soon it'll be fixed, how responsive the 'team' will be to bug reports, how compatible it'll be with other system components AND whether 'compatibility' will be achieved before the entire OS has been systematically imported into (and badly replicated by) the project.

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I don't think honestly he gets enough credit.

If you check SystemD, its a HUGE step up, which is why everyone is using it now (whereas, the old scripts had race conditions, were a pain to write and other issues). Anyone who has written both can tell you how much better things are now..

The fact this issue is happening on both Pipewire and Pulseaudio also suggests it's more likely a bug in the drivers.. It might not be obvious on ALSA directly, but that doesn't mean an issue doesn't exist there..

And honestly, the situation before PulseAudio was awful. Audio not working was a common issue, and low latency audio was the least of anyone's problems. Whereas, these days, because of Pulseaudio, even gaming is a thing now (back then, I even saw issues on tuxracer, and Unreal tournament back in the days).

In regards to setup, most distributions will handle that anyway I'm guessing. So not sure why the configuration process should matter unless you're in Arch or Slackware? As long as the distribution handles it, it shouldn't matter. It'd really a non-issue honestly.

I do a lot of middleware development and we're regularly blamed by users for bugs/problems upstream too (which is why we've now added a huge amount of enduser diagnostics/metrics in our products which has made it more obvious the issues aren't related to us). In practice, very few people have issues with Pulseaudio (I haven't seen issues since launch). Sometimes as well, keep in mind it can be the sound interface (especially if its USB)

[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The fact this issue is happening on both Pipewire and Pulseaudio also suggests it’s more likely a bug in the drivers… It might not be obvious on ALSA directly, but that doesn’t mean an issue doesn’t exist there…

I probably made the overlap unclear, sorry:

  • Pipewire issues: My 2023 desktop and 2016 laptop, very different hardware.
  • Pulseaudio issues: All of my pre-2023 desktops and several family laptops

I do a lot of middleware development and we’re regularly blamed by users for bugs/problems upstream too (which is why we’ve now added a huge amount of enduser diagnostics/metrics in our products which has made it more obvious the issues aren’t related to us).

Eep, that's annoying. You also probably don't have direct interaction with the users most of the time (they're not your customer) which makes this worse, people in a vacuum follow each other's stories.

In practice, very few people have issues with Pulseaudio (I haven’t seen issues since launch). Sometimes as well, keep in mind it can be the sound interface (especially if its USB)

There might be a bias here because these problems are not persistent, ie a reboot fixes them.

In regards to setup, most distributions will handle that anyway I’m guessing. So not sure why the configuration process should matter unless you’re in Arch or Slackware? As long as the distribution handles it, it shouldn’t matter. It’d really a non-issue honestly.

That's potentially more things different distros can do differently and more issues your middleware will start getting blamed for.

Yes it's not a problem for user-friendly distros, but why does the user friendliness problem exist anywhere anyway? It's better to fix problems upstream, not downstream.

load more comments (2 replies)