this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
184 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
4121 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ireland's data regulator confirmed to AFP that Meta has not paid any of the ₹2 billion ($2.2 billion) in fines issued since last September. TikTok also owes hundreds of millions.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 20 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I always wondered what recourse these governments have to enforce these fines.

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Even GDPR fines are rarely paid in full. We hear about the levied fine since that’s public, but not the actual payment deal.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Guillotine?

[–] kirklennon@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It’s not like these companies are just refusing to pay their fines, as this article falsely implies. There are ongoing legal disputes. Most of Meta’s “unpaid” fines, for example, are from just six months ago and there are legitimate disagreements on them that are subject to appeal.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They should do what happens to parking fines here in Finland. If you want to dispute it you can, but you need to pay the original fine or you get interest and late fees added on. As far as I know if you win, you get the original fine returned, not the interest or fees.

[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I like this idea

[–] kirklennon@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago

In the Meta case from earlier this year, the Irish regulator that imposed the fines did not think it warranted fines at all but they were overruled by a European organization. When the national regulator who investigated the offenses disagrees with the punishment, I think we can at the very least consider it a legitimate subject of dispute.

The article also says that Apple has fought for years against a 1.1 billion Euro fine in France. What the article leaves out is that Apple has been successful. Courts have already agreed with Apple and eliminated roughly 2/3 of that fine. Again, clearly there is a legitimate legal dispute over a fine if the legal system determines the regulators were, indeed, wrong.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Hmm, with some lawsuits going years and years, seems like postponing decisions could save a lot because of the time value of money. Maybe one could make a law to account for a standard opportunity cost per industry to increase the fine amount from the date committed to the date paid.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago

Of course, that's understood, but what I wonder about is how would they enforce it? Does Ireland have the capabilities to block all of Meta's IPs nationwide? If so, what about VPNs? Can they get Apple and Google to delist Meta for Irish citizens? Essentially, I'm wondering about the logistics of enforcement.

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Banning product?

[–] dumdum666@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, they can seize company property.

But the Irish Government and therefore their Data Protection Entity don’t actually want Data Privacy because they earn quite a lot of money with the actual lack thereof.

So they are not going to do anything about it unless they are forced by European Institutions or other European governments.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well, they can seize company property.

In places like Ireland, where it was notoriously used as a tax haven loophole, do many large multinationals using it for that purpose have any real company presence there? Genuine question.

[–] 520@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

They usually have a decent office in Dublin but that's about it.

[–] kirklennon@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Apple has several thousand employees in Ireland. Ireland wanted to lure foreign investment by offering lower taxes and it worked. Ireland was happy. Apple was happy. Decades later, the EU decided it wasn’t happy.