this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
31 points (91.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54121 readers
570 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I was thinking perhaps a dedicated machine with perhaps a load of HDDs in it.

Curious if anyone has an idea on how to efficiently mass seed.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why are you trying to mass seed popular torrents? You'll just wind up splitting your bandwidth per torrent so much that people will go to other seeders. If you do less popular torrents you may get less activity but you'll seed a higher percentage each time and probably be doing more of a service.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not OP, but this is solid advice that I never would have considered

[–] stown@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Private tracker and seed requirements is the reason that comes to mind for me. Back when I was on a private tracker some 20 years ago I would get the torrent file and the actual data from a friend so I could seed it without having downloaded it.

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, but you're gonna be competing with all the fastest seeders with popular torrents on private trackers from my experience so you probably won't get much of any upload credit until the hype dies down. If you need the credit and have the file already somehow I would even suggest bringing a torrent back from the dead that has a leecher or two trying to download.

[–] ancoraunamoka@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your question is so generic that it is difficult to reply. I'll tell you about my use case then so that you can try to figure out yours.

My goal is to be a respectful citizen. I divide my torrents in three categories:

  • rare stuff: for example project 4k77 or the John Wick regrades or Rashomon
  • italian stuff: it can be either popular stuff and also rare stuff; italian content is not seeded much so I need to do my part
  • common/popular stuff: for example the barbie movie or every marvel stuff

I bought tons of space (recently converted to three drives, 20tb each) and use a virtual machine locked behind a vpn. Even if I forget to paid, the virtual machine is bind to the tunnel so that traffic doesn't go out except for LAN, so no leaks.

The VM has two torrent client:

  • qbittorrent: seed the torrents in the common / popular categories, speed capped to 1/3 of my bandwidth
  • transmission (previously using rtorrent) for the other two categories

I tend to leave everything in transmission seeded forever, the stuff in qbittorrent seeded until 2.5 ratio or 4.0 depending on my mood.

At the moment I have 90.2 ration on transmission and many many many TB of uploaded stuff. That should be enough to feel like you are giving back

[–] ANIMATEK@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You can do the same with just 3 containers: qBittorrent, qbit manage, and some VPN. You will be saving a ton of resources while having more granular control over how you handle the seeding. That’s what I have :)

[–] ancoraunamoka@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

qbit manage

that is an interesting advice. Regarding containers, they don't fit my use case.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Rent a seedbox.

[–] Elkenders@feddit.uk 2 points 10 months ago

You want a server. I imagine an unraid server given your description.

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

A seedbox might work for your needs. However they come with a monthly cost.