this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
-37 points (8.9% liked)

Technology

59092 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How about not use Chromium? Mozilla/Firefox browsers actually provide privacy protections. Like actually, not chrome plated promises.

[–] Photographer@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The biggest worry is that Chrome brings about change of websites which then requires other browsers to take on their trusted platform stuff in order to work.

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I share the same concern. I think either Firefox will find a workaround or privacy advocates will develop open source services to act as shell to access the internet.

I feel it’ll be the latter.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Even if you do think it's plausible that Google can do this in a way that can't be beaten (at every step so far they've lost this war, so the odds really aren't on their side, but let's allow it as a possibility), this just means that we need to get more people onto non-Chromium browsers (meaning Firefox and whatever else comes along) so that it becomes infeasible to run a website that only supports chromium based browsers.

[–] hagelslager@feddit.nl 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

I know the title is clickbait, but why RIP uBlock? There's more than just Chromium browsers.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

Yep. Not one mention of firefox in the article...

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

The article even says that there is a updated ublock origin out for mv3. Its just clickbait.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de -1 points 11 months ago

True, RIP chromium bozos

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Just gonna rep for Safari here, since it’s been ignored so far.