Programmer Humor

Something like that happened to me yesterday. I reviewed one PR, then some Important Guy came in and said:

• it is nice you reviewed my work, but we need to push this to production right now.
• just fix these things, I described you how. Just copy/paste these snippets
• these are cosmetics, I don't care
• "cosmetics", huh? Your shit may just crash
• gfy and push this to production right now
• well, ok

Of course, lack of these "cosmetics" caused crash in production. It's my fault of course.

Am not sure I disagree but I don't agree completely. It's insane to merge things that go to production without testing. However at the same time I don't like continuous integration one bit. Open source mantra is great in my opinion. Release early, release often. If code chews some important data, have a test version of it that needs to run some time before it gets pushed to production.

Delaying merge of someone's code means branches get further and further apart. At the same time code in main branch gets fixed and tested the most. I would merge often but only full features. None of the half-done stuff. Let humans test it a bit before it reaches target audience. That is usually good enough to catch most bugs. Those that do happen to leak into production are easily fixed since you have fast development cycle and deployment pipeline. And backup frequently.

"Xtreme programming practices".

Lmao what!

Does he work at Rivian?

I mean this is basically a wiki, isn't it.

Test it? Meh. Just ship it.

The "send it" school of PRs.

You guys review?

I wonder how many programmers out there have intentionally set out to subtly sabotage the system. Anyone doing that, good luck to you.

Pete was Heard, but was he Listened To?

As a SOC auditor you programmers are going to make me scream at the exceptions you guys cause.

This explains what is going on a facebook.