this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
176 points (92.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54424 readers
1128 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chagall@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you actually read the article, you see that this problem is 100% solvable if you use a VPN.

[–] supervent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Aye if you want mid-90s download speeds

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

That's what I understood too, but I thought I was wrong since this group can not be that stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Skies5394@lemmy.ml 92 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is for the Netherlands, but it’s about the anti-piracy group not allowing defeats in court on the basis of GDPR and ISP refusal get in the way of a good harassment.

Good read if you want higher blood pressure.

[–] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Most seedboxes are in Netherlands.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thorned_Rose@kbin.social 88 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"injured rights holders"

🙄🙄🙄🙄🤮

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even if they do make it to court; how do they plan on translating an IP address into the ID of the actual infringer? (not the ISP subscriber, they can't be assumed to be the same, particularly in court)

Just because I pay for my families internet connection doesn't make me responsible, culpable, or even aware of their activities. Even less so now that I'm not going to receive any notice of potentially illicit activity.

If they could haul people into court based on just an IP and get somewhere useful, they'd have done it hundreds of thousands of times over already.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 20 points 1 year ago

Use a multi hop VPN that doesn't advertise next to raid shadow legends

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

One thing I always find curious is these "rights holders" assuming a 100% sales conversion from piracy when, in reality, it's probably closer to 1-10%

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.de 13 points 11 months ago

Plus, there are studies that show piracy can actually be a positive factor for sales in some cases.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 10 points 11 months ago

I can see that - if you're pirating you'll just take anything because there's no cost, but if you're buying something it has to be worth it.

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago

I doubt it's even positive.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 year ago

Fuck this group with an engorged cactus. Pieces of shit.

[–] BluesF@feddit.uk 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Many copyright holders believe that if they’re able to communicate with pirates, a proportion will change their behavior.

Yes, they will probably be more careful next time

[–] mayonaise_met@feddit.nl 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When the day comes that Brein starts sending notices to pirates, these pirates will just move to Newsgroups and VPNs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 months ago

Dutch company sends pirates dick pics with ominous warnings as a means of fearmongering for the pirates

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

BREIN. There's an evil villain name if I ever saw one.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

If fact, I think the bad guy from Half-Life 2 had that name.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I suspect this is not going to go well when they find poor people who torrent for the community and try to squeeze them for blood in the courts, or find that an academic server is used to seed in it's idle time.

This figured into the cruel, heartless reputations of the MPA and RIAA that persist to this day.

[–] ramblinguy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Have the MPA and RIAA stopped being cruel and heartless?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Yglorba@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it says that they're all "well we would have rather do it the other way for your sakes" but the fact is that if they thought they could reliably obtain money this way they'd be doing it already. A ton of legal fees are going to be wasted pursuing people they can't catch for one reason or another, meaning that their desire to make the pirates pay their costs isn't going to work as reliably as they'd want.

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.de 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can someone TL;DR the actual "worse" thing?

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They will skip the notice via proxy (your ISP passing a notice to you without identifying you to the claimant) and go straight to court to have the ISP forced to provide the ID of the subscriber for a specific IP observed to be active torrenting copyrighted materials.

Then they'll attempt to recover those court costs from that subscriber as well as sue them for the original copyright infringement.

I think they'll have quite an uphill battle with that approach, particularly when trying to prove the subscriber to an internet connection is also responsible for, let alone aware of, the alleged infringement. If it was that easy, they wouldn't have bothered with notices to begin with.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 32 points 11 months ago

Yeah this happened during the Napster era and it was so incredibly unpopular and unsympathetic with the general public that it didn't continue after a while. Suing a single mom on food stamps for thousands of dollars because her teenage son downloaded a game one time is a truly abominable look for a company.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 11 months ago

imagine if they spent half as much time going after abusers or billionaire tax cheats as they do people who download game of thrones from seven years ago.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

BRB switching my VPN location to the fucking NETHERLANDS

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN

How sad do you have to be

[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I watched a thing about copyright and trademark enforcement where the corporate organization was somehow able to gather a team of 50 police at tax payer expense and march them into a Sunday market in order to capture and shut down market stores selling fake knockoffs. You could see how wildly unpopular it was with the entire crowd around them where some shoppers even continued browsing and trying to purchase goods from the shut down stores even with cops standing right there trying to make the crowd move on.

Copyright and trademark infringement against multi-billionare companies with continuous record profits is seen as a victimless "crime" at best by the vast majority of people, even reasonably well off people too. The only repercussion if you're "caught" should be just paying the actual construction/reproduction cost of the item which is pennies, they weren't going to make this sale at their ridiculous retail price in the first place and their real losses are miniscule at best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (16 children)

And that is why I don't torrent, living in Germany. Even just leeching will put you on the radar of, at best scam law firms, at worst motivated rights-holders.

[–] plague_sapiens@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

VPN and you are fine lol. Sometimes you have to pay even for illegal stuff... Nothing's free...

[–] supervent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You could use i2p for bittorrent, it is free, slower but secure.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] zjaume@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

We really need to push for the use of i2p for torrenting. Given that the the offer of VPNs with port forwarding that are decent is little and decreasing every year.

[–] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 months ago

I feel like most people including producers don't care so much, they care more about promoting more people to get into the whole creatives sector so to speak so that there's less concentrated loss of capital and risk for everyone involved including the pirates and "copyright enforcers"

load more comments
view more: next ›