this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
122 points (87.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35281 readers
706 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Given that racists and slavers used the "natural physical strength" of black people to justify putting them on hard labor and some medics still think that blacks has higher resistance to pain, I wonder if when black athletes started to join mixed race sport teams, some racist would have used the same "biological advantage" argument that now transphobes use against trans athletes to claim it was "unfair" for black to compete against whites to justify segregation.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Omnificer@lemmy.world 88 points 10 months ago (5 children)

For a while there was a persistent myth that black people had an extra muscle in their leg that allowed them to perform better at sports.

It's kind of similar to phrenology in trying to justify racism.

[–] skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

While there is no extra muscle, it is factually true that people of West African descent tend to have more fast twitch muscle fibers which is a pretty big advantage in many sports.

This is likely why the myth of the extra muscle originated.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Is that really true though? Many of these sports myths hold true until they suddenly don't. Tall people were believed to be awful sprinters until Usain Bolt somehow just smashed everyone. Koreans nerds were the supposed chosen SC2 players but now it's a chad from Italy

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

Yes, those people are outliers. Usain Bolt especially is a genetic rarity, being as tall as he is with crazy amounts of fast twitch muscles.

[–] skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

It's true, but some people go way too far with it. All it means is that people of West African descent tend to have more fast twitch muscle fibers. You could be white as sour cream and get lucky with your genetics and end up the same way. It's having those muscle fibers that's the advantage, not having west african heritage. In sports like basketball or sprinting where fast twitch fibers are a big advantage, you tend to see populations of people who are predisposed to that getting over-represented.

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't there a basketball coach that got fired for saying basically this, albeit not as...elegantly?

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This was taught to me in grade school. I feel pretty betrayed.

Suffice it to say, I found it dubious even as a child and as an adult, learned better, but WTF.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

I remember my friend's mom telling me this when I was like 6 and then I told my mom what I learned and she told me not to listen to that lady.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 6 points 10 months ago

My dad told me as a kid black folks have more fast-twitch muscle fibers.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This may have been the time when dissecting cadavers was very, very looked down on. It was seen as desecrating the body. So knowledge of the body just wasn't there.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, this shit was pretty prevalent in the 90s and I guarantee some people are still parroting it today.

[–] boogetyboo@aussie.zone 5 points 10 months ago

Ergh I'm guilty of repeating this bullshit when I was younger. It had been sold to me as a fact, not in what I perceived was a racist context per se - more a 'oh cool, lucky them, that makes sense gestures at basketball' way. Believe me, I get it now. Also, my mum's black... Where did I get this bullshit from? White men can't jump?

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Possibly, though the difference in strength and endurance between a male and female is much, much larger than between two different races. Male high school athletes outperform Olympic medal winning female athletes in almost every category. The difference is stark.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It was sort of the opposite at the very start of integrated sports. In the US and UK, at least, it was widely believed that Black men could not play sports simply because they did not, in fact, play (professional) sports. (And of course women were barely allowed to play sport at all in that era.)

Claims that Black people are naturally better at sports came later on, along with reasons why they couldn't swim, or play tennis or golf, or ride horses, or do any of those sports that coincidentally have more access for kids with wealthy and/or suburban parents.

System justification is an easy game to play. A story for every occasion.

[–] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There was an NFL commentator named Jimmy the Greek who said something like "they are bred to be a better athlete" on air. He was fired shortly thereafter. Can't remember when it happened though, maybe the mid 1980's. Not sure if he himself was racist or if he was just saying what popped into his head.

[–] cerevant@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Here's his quote:

The black is a better athlete to begin with, because he's been bred to be that way. Because of his high thighs and big thighs that goes up into his back. And they can jump higher and run faster because of their bigger thighs. And he's bred to be the better athlete because this goes back all the way to the Civil War, when, during the slave trading, the big, the owner, the slave owner would breed his big black to his big woman so that he could have uh big black kid, see. That's where it all started!

Racist. Definitely racist.

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah, using "black" as a noun cleared that up pretty quickly

[–] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Honestly I think the part of this that surprises me is that he got fired for this.. in the 1980s.

I wonder if there's an ask historians thread on exactly when racism became "denormalized", if that's a word.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I can't remember a specific example, but that does sound familiar. I remember someone claiming a possible reason for their strength was that slavers would breed slaves like animals for certain traits.

[–] vis4valentine@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think someone who is forced to do hard labor since birth of course is gonna be stronger than a master who can't wipe his own ass without 15 servants helping him, so they gotta think blacks are naturally stronger.

[–] BrerChicken@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Not to mention the fact that all of this person's family are people who were strong enough to survive a miserable voyage, chained up down below. Many people didn't survive that trip, but the ones who did obviously tended to be stronger and healthier than those who didn't.

[–] RickRussell_CA@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The famous example you're thinking of is Jimmy Snyder, aka Jimmy the Greek, a sports commentator and sports betting expert who used to work for CBS sports. He was interviewed as part of a series about civil rights in the US, and the interviewer was sort of expecting him to say something pleasant about black folks' success in athletics opening doors for education and leadership, etc.

Instead he made some pretty astonishing claims that were intensely racist.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Black people. White people.

I'm English, when you call people just a color it's degrading. So we add the 'people'.

[–] RIP_Apollo@feddit.ch 13 points 10 months ago

If you’re English, then you misspelt the word ‘colour’.

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Same in the US now, but in our case it's because although 'people' is clearly self-evident if you're talking about a person/people, during the time of segregation those were the terms used - coloreds & whites. Whites Only Water Fountain. Whites Only Bathroom. Coloreds at the back of the bus, only Whites up front.

[–] Satish@thebrainbin.org -2 points 10 months ago

https://seeuwiki.com/jolina-dela-cruz-boyfriend-parents-height-age/ Jolina Dela Cruz is the asian-filipino athlete who will soon create a history, then you will forget black and white athletes talks, she is best