this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2021
15 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17698 readers
10 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vis4valentine@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

That actually looks good. Lets see how people use it

[–] the_tech_beast@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Hmm.. interesting

I wonder what the use case for groups will be. Share photos to only selected people?

[–] Stephen304@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago

The screenshots look like its essentially facebook groups, which would be nice because im in a lot of facebook meme groups and havent seen any federated alternatives with a UX that i feel i could really pitch to somone deep into instagram / fb / whatsapp land.

[–] Halce@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Hopefully this is implemented like https://github.com/bookwyrm-social/bookwyrm/issues/1548 using the Group Actor type of AP, in order to be compatibile, otherwise there’s little point for it.

[–] nutomic@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Interesting, it seems that every project implements groups in wildly different ways. Both bookwyrm and pleroma are going for private groups primarily, with public groups as an afterthought.

[–] humanetech@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

Yes, it seems to be the only way that fediverse evolves.. organically, haphazardly maybe. I don't know whether that is good or bad, but I find it a bit disheartening to see that it so hard to get a bit of broader collaboration off the ground. The prior discussion on SocialHub on Standardizing ActivityPub Groups (which was a continuation of a much older discussion) has sorta stalled again. Though still the occasional reply seeps in..