this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
29 points (85.4% liked)

Science

13140 readers
2 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nick@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Next weeks news: same engineers mysteriously all committed suicide by two bullets to the back of each of their heads. Big oil has no comment.

[–] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

If this discovery was really a thing you can bet it!

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

I am concerned about the growing mountain of miracle devices that are meant to solve climate change, and the environmental effects said mountain is having on climate change.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't see how using the carbon again as fuel solves anything.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

If you recycle existing carbon from the atmosphere then you're not adding more carbon. So, in that sense it's better.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So they expect home users to handle liquid potassium or sodium formate? Isn't that quite hazardous?

[–] AdminWorker@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Well, yes and no. Most likely its adoption would be where petroleum stations start creating it on site and selling like a carbon neutral gasoline. Energy has to come from somewhere, so it will probably take solar power to store as fomate and sell as fuel