this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
123 points (94.9% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3135 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] walrusintraining@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Isn’t it always the plan for Dems to unseat Republicans? That’s how the 2 party system works no?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I believe the tactic is prioritizing those districts with resources.

[–] roofuskit@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

That's always the tactic. But a speaker vote for a psycho like Jordan will make it so much easier.

[–] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.ninja 11 points 11 months ago

What they’re doing is publicly signaling that they’re going to spend a lot of money in those districts if these reps vote for Jim Jordan. They’re already swing districts, so anyone who wants to keep his seat is going to have to raise and spend even more money. The Dems are betting that the pressure of having to fundraise and fight a contested election is more of a problem than just making up an excuse to not vote for Jordan.

[–] neptune@dmv.social 3 points 11 months ago

Yes but if PACs identify potential weaknesses they will strategize how to take advantage. It's how politics work now.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

You'd think.

[–] twisted28@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

You would think so yes. But they divide up the country, take the corporate cash, and him haw about how we didn’t vote enough. Weaponized incompetence at its finest.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 8 points 11 months ago

"I hate the double standard that exists. It’s because Democrats are always the adults. If this was Nancy Pelosi, do you think that anyone would be saying, ‘Hey, Republicans, go help Nancy?’ No one would be saying that. No one would even expect that. But they always expect us to fix their mess.”

— Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX),

[–] Nerrad@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

The threat is easily overcome by bribing moderate republicons with cushy jobs if they lose.