this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
220 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18769 readers
4122 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Studious_Gluteus@kbin.social 54 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The shows will go on.

  • paraphrased from that judge, for those who may have trouble parsing that headline.
[–] emolr@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, I was wondering if I somehow forgot to read

[–] books@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thank God I wasn't alone.

Fucking word soup up there.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Nope, definitely not alone.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Montana judge continues blocking anti-drag-laws

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah, holy shit, that headline is hard to parse with the "maintenance of restrictions on enforcement of bans."

[–] Tammo-Korsai@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm sure many Republicans are rejoicing since a fair few of them love drag shows.

[–] jerome@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

Ha! Your comment is like the headline!

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

RuPublicans.

Hey there's no shame in being fabulous. They should get to live their best lives too. Queens 👑👠

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

american law confuses me.
It is a good thing the shitty law doesn't get enforced, but it's so strange to me how a judge can just ban enforcement of a law. Is it. Even a law then

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Laws can't conflict with the US Constitution, so if a law says that people with certain clothes aren't allowed to speak, then the judge can say that's not a real law.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

It's the freedom of speech thing people seem to hate. Drag is a form of art and expression so there's a massive hurdle in trying to ban it. If they can't make it over the hurdle of the first amendment it is unenforceable as a law.

There are still sodomy laws on the books in some states that are entirely useless.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

The party concerned about freedom is really concerned about controlling what people wear.