this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

/kbin meta

1 readers
4 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago
 

I've just discovered that lemmy.world (and potentially other) users I've banned from my magazine are still able to comment, comments I can't see on kbin but that do show up on lemmy.world.
(E: I already knew removed comments still show up on other instances, but assumed that sorts itself out in time, but now I'm not so sure)

This makes modding futile.

I want to make sure my space is safe and not hostile to those of us who already deal with bullshit everywhere else, and I can't do that when this is the case.

How do we fix this?

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] adam@kbin.pieho.me 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is actually due to the way these platforms work. When a user comments on a comment or post on their instance it will be shown on their instance. It's then sent on to the owning instance of that comment or post. That owning instance then forwards it on to all interested parties (magazine instance, commenters instance).

Any instance in that chain can refuse to forward or broadcast that message due to a block, but the users own instance will likely always show that post. Ideally they would not do that and would be made aware of a block but that is a bit of a grey area in ActivityPub implementations.

@adam thank you for explaining this. Am I correct to understand, then, that this is something about which we ought to approach the #activityPub devs, rather than ernest?

Ernest's comment that ActivityPub tries to federate moderation (but isn't ?why) was very interesting.

It seems to me, on the face of it at least, that moderation is a key part of any social medium.