this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
45 points (88.1% liked)

Out of the loop

10994 readers
3 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen so much stuff on what it means and how it affects people but I can't find anything on the reason behind why anyone wants to shut down the government

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 83 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would note that the USA is about the only place this is actually possible.

In pretty much all other democracies, if the parliament fails to pass the budget bill, it triggers a dissolution of both houses and an election is held.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We need that in the USA too

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

I agree but when was the last time a politician (either singly or as a party) voted to restrict their behaviour and power?

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like you guys would just end up in a constant election cycle

[–] crypticthree@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

We already are.

[–] Travalanche@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's an unfortunately common, bullshit move politicians pull, just to have something to hang over each other's heads in order to get what they want. Unfortunately, that has become totally ok in the eyes of Republican voters because it's often the only way for their reps to force through budget items that would otherwise never make it.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Republicans* pull

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 21 points 1 year ago

Mom gives you a weekly grocery list with $50 worth of products on it. You must buy everything on it every week.

Mom tells you to take $150 out of her wallet every month. You may not take any more.

You know you'll be short. She knows you'll be short. But you can get by for three weeks, so she'll wait until then to address the issue.

[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Congress is supposed to decide yearly on how and where money gets spent in the federal government budget. If they do not pass the budget before the old one expires, the federal government cannot spend any more money, and it's operations immediately cease.

The political factions of Congress get into pretty regular spats over how the money is spent, either because not enough is going towards projects certain factions want, or too much is going towards projects that other factions are staunchly opposed to. Sometimes unrelated law bills get tacked to the side that become a point of contention too. With politics becoming more and more polarized, they reach deadlock and can't agree on the budget, and bam, you get a shutdown.

The same goes for the artificial "debt ceiling" Congress imposed upon themselves that limits how much money the government can borrow from... well, itself, basically. When they hit the cap they also cannot continue spending, so it has to be regularly increased (achieving absolutely nothing)

Either/both sides can and will try to threaten a shutdown as a bargaining chip to get what they want, but it's so overused at this point that it really doesn't help much. They still run right to the end, pass some temporary in-situ funding agreements, continue the deadlock, then go back to massive deficit spending at the end of the day anyway.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not American, so I assume I don't have the full story. But i feel like everytime I hear about government shutdown / not passing budgets it's republican politicians. Is that accurate? Or do both parties do it equally often?

[–] Shalakushka@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

It's always, always, always the Republicans.

[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I try to not point fingers... but yes, a solid 90% of the time it's the conservative faction holding things up.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well it's basically a way to roll back spending the last Congress approved, so of course it would be a cudgel wielded primarily by conservatives.

I'm of the opinion that the 14th amendment makes the whole process moot, but I'm no constitutional scholar.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 year ago

as @Travalaaaaaaanche! mentioned, it’s just a form of brinksmanship – they don’t care “how it affects people” so long as they get their way

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

The government shuts down when there's no budget passed by Congress authorizing the money to keep it open. This isn't a good thing but happens when Congress can't get it's act straight. Crazy Republicans from deep red districts are making basic governing impossible, like passing a budget.

[–] dyslexicdainbroner@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because congress has totally abdicated their constitutional duties - read it - this is not how our government works - this is an inexorably broken government - both sides.

[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

In what way is this the fault of both sides? This is very clearly an entirely manufactured "crisis" by the GOP.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Republicans breaking the give to own the libs