this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1111 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3575 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] naticus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've played this game and know where it's headed. They've decided to create Vega. Prepare for them to announce Argent Energy soon.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Training large language models is an incredibly power-intensive process that has an immense carbon footprint.

Now, The Verge reports, Microsoft is betting so big on AI that its pushing forward with a plan to power them using nuclear reactors.

Yes, you read that right; a recent job listing suggests the company is planning to grow its energy infrastructure with the use of small modular reactors (SMR.)

But before Microsoft can start relying on nuclear power to train its AIs, it'll have plenty of other hurdles to overcome.

Then, it'll have to figure out how to get its hands on a highly enriched uranium fuel that these small reactors typically require, as The Verge points out.

Nevertheless, the company signed a power purchase agreement with Helion, a fusion startup founded by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman earlier this year, with the hopes of buying electricity from it as soon as 2028.


The original article contains 346 words, the summary contains 147 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

While I appreciate them going a greener route, if these chat AIs are still this inefficient to simply train, maybe it is best left to return them back to the research phrase.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] vluz@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh my Gwyn, this comment section is just amazing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s pretty cool. I would have guessed it would be cheaper to use wind energy.

[–] GuillaumeGus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Cheaper but unreliable.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›