this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2022
70 points (93.8% liked)

Memes

45189 readers
1432 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Anyone else feel that the ads load way faster with less buffering than the actual videos?

[–] Fissionami@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The ads are probably cached on the device from the first load. So that'll explain why

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I never use the YouTube app (I use NewPipe), but even the YouTube website does this.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago
[–] vitaminka@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

not very weird most likely, considering that there are significantly fewer ads and they're much shorter in length than videos, therefore it makes sense to cache them in some way 🤷‍♀️

[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I saw some ads on YouTube a few years ago, they started to do actual segments in the videos themselves to circumvent my ad-blocker. So I installed SponsorBlock.

I haven't seen ads on YouTube for years.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Use the front-end Piped, it block ads, restrictions, jumps sponsor blocks and even intros, or use uBlock Origin

[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've used uBlock Origin for years. That's the adblocker in-video ads are circumventing.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No such problems here, update the filters, maybe it solve the problem, Anyway, using Piped all of this crap is blocked.

[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How will the filters cut out or skip the part of the video where the host themselves promote a product in the video itself?

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sponsor blocks carry a signal encoded in the video, through the googlevideoAPI, to allow YouTube Premium users to skip them. This is intercepted by Piped and by extensions like SponsorBlock, while other front ends, like instances of Invidious, which are based on the googlevideoAPI, block ads, but cannot do so with sponsorblocks.

[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Enough.

Sponsor blocks carry a signal encoded in the video

No. "Users submit when a sponsor happens from the extension, and the extension automatically skips sponsors it knows about."

https://github.com/ajayyy/SponsorBlock

through the googlevideoAPI

No.

https://github.com/ajayyy/SponsorBlockServer

I'm not discussing with you any more.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

It seems very good to me, you mean how the extension works and I talk about how the sponsor blocks are inserted in the video with a code, that the extension or Piped has in its base to intercept it.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I use uBlock and it does a pretty good job as well

[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 6 points 2 years ago

I've used uBlock Origin for years. That's the adblocker in-video ads are circumventing.

[–] Catradora_Stalinism@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think theres just a salty boi who tails you around and downvotes you lol

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

LOL I guess I really got under their skin

[–] Dragon@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] papercut@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Newpipe with Sponsorblock.

[–] SrEstegosaurio@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago
[–] SudoDnfDashY@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Don't forget Freetube!!

[–] onlooker@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Dragon@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

You can still download it

[–] guojing@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are ads on youtube???

[–] dragnucs@social.touha.me 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] guojing@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I wouldnt know. Good that ublock origin and newpipe exist.

[–] octt@feddit.it 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Me vibing with my Invidious instance that lets me have no ads, no tracking or proprietary scripts, and syncing of subscriptions, history, and playlist on all my devices 😌

[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've run a personal Invidious instance for a while, it's a great product for sure. Right now my flow is based on RSS which syncs my vids and views across devices, if Invidious and NewPipe get the sync they've talked about to work reliably? I'm definitely going back.

[–] octt@feddit.it 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I too am waiting for Invidious integration in NewPipe, not really because I don't like the Invidious UI/UX but because I have a bug (only on mobile data, not WiFi, and only on Invidious, not on NewPipe or the YouTube webapp) where the video stops loading after a while and I have to refresh the page (and the playback doesn't even resume at the point it stopped :c). So right now, Invidious on my smartphone is not really pleasant, it could be better.

[–] vitaminka@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

interestingly, the youtube app on my phone doesn't have ads at all (as of recently), most likely because companies don't want to advertise in russia, but youtube still doesn't want to pull out, because of potential future revenue (after the war ends), and they can still sell user data 😎

[–] ree@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Pro trick for all the other: use a russian proxy

[–] thervingi@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

YouTube has ads? I've never seen any. That's because I use uBlock Origin and NewPipe.

[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Figuratively too. Most videos are consumerist garbage.

[–] Silviecat44@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago

Would you rather the creators not get paid? Seriously

[–] Hovenko@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

the web is unusable without it

[–] fu@libranet.de 0 points 1 year ago

that's one more reason to access their content via an invidious instance like yewtu.be

[–] OnishiMyers@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean... kinda duh? By definition every corporation revolves around what will get them money. ISPs aren't giving youtube a cut of the subscription costs... we aren't paying for youtube premium or whatever they call it. Saying youtube is only interested in throwing us ads, is like saying Jiffy Lube only changes my oil because they want to get paid for it.

[–] gladiatorchocolate@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

The point is, there are too many ads