this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
1005 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59311 readers
4999 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

FCC details plan to restore the net neutrality rules repealed by Ajit Pai::Democrats finally have 3-2 majority needed to regulate ISPs as common carriers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de 194 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Fuck that sell-out Ajit Pai.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 114 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And Trump who appointed him, and the Republicans who blocked voting in his replacement.

[–] Otkaz@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He was actually appointed by Obama.

Source https://www.fcc.gov/biography-former-chairman-ajit-pai

Trump made him chairman

[–] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 year ago

Yeah but Trump made him chairman

[–] Treatyoself@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck him and his stupid ass Reese’s mug.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d… I’d eat ass Reese’s

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We need a floodgate for ass resees eating.

[–] chrischryse@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] EddieTee77@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been calling him that for as long as he's been around as well! Another person of culture

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

A shit pie ?

[–] poopiddy@pawb.social 8 points 1 year ago

more like Ajit POO

[–] mcribbs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I have nothing to really add but I just want to say fuck Ajit Pai... Oooooo that felt good.

[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm sick of this back and forth can kicking. We need a fucking law.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about a new article in the constitution?

I guess most will find this completely overkill but access to free information should be a right everybody has and no party should be able to remove that.

I understand amending the constitution of any country should be done very carefully but keeping century old constitutions is completely dumb imo. Some articles are still relevant today others are not or would seriously benefit in being updated.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 12 points 1 year ago

Yes! I've been arguing that we need a sort of "digital bill of rights" for years now

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A few more election cycles and boomers will finally be outnumbered.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The January 6 crowd was a lot younger than boomer age...

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah but not by much, the only young people there, were that weirdo Q Shaman guy

[–] Misconduct@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago

And we need to demolish lobbying. The things we could accomplish if those useless and sleazy detriments to society were all put out of their jobs permanently.

[–] Hoomod@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

If we can fix some gerrymanders it'll go a long way also

Like the shitshow that is the maps in WI, which will head to the (now) liberal controlled state Supreme Court.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Takes 60 votes in the US Senate to beat the filibuster. Republicans will not provide the 9 votes needed.

[–] Random_user@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Make
Internet
A
Federally
Protected
Utility
You sons of bitches

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We'll have to get rid of some conservatives in congress first. Conservatives (and some neo-liberals) rake in legal bribes from ISP's and are also champing at the bit to control all forms of communication.

Conservatism is a plague of oppression and corruption.

[–] Amends1782@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First positive political thing I've heard in a while. Fuck that guy. Fucking hate him

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

O.o The debt relief of students wasn’t positive?

[–] swordsmanluke@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I thought that got blocked - or at least, tied up in court. I know there are ongoing initiatives, but isn't the only "big" one, the one that was repaying funds -stolen- from borrowers? Like, refunding overpayments?

[–] omicron@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The one-time loan forgiveness grant got shut down, yes. But Biden did manage to pass another way to handle student debt relief through the form of a revamped income repayment plan, with wayyyyy more forgiving terms than previous plans, to the point that you could essentially be forgiven of your student loans.

[–] dan@lemmy.fdr8.us 2 points 1 year ago

That's my understanding as well. The current initiative is far more limited in scope, and pays back students who were defrauded by scam schools.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I believe it’s still happening through executive order?

[–] SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m really glad this is being done, I just hope that it has teeth. It’s going to be very annoying when the next regime from across the aisle tries to repeal the rules again. I assume there’s not an easy way to make these rules permanent. I’m happy to be wrong about that though.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There would be if we had a government focused on consumer protections. Instead we have a House too busy kicking itself in the dick to make laws, and even if they did, the laws would probably PREVENT the FCC from making Net Neutrality rules.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Remember that absolutely fucking stupid ad Ajit made about using the net? Awful.

[–] Uncaged_Jay@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

In all seriousness, what has having these laws repealed done? I'm asking because I don't know.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Federal Communications Commission Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel today announced plans to restore net neutrality rules similar to those that were adopted during the Obama era and then repealed by the FCC when Donald Trump was president.

Rosenworcel announced her plans in a speech today, one day after the FCC gained a 3-2 Democratic majority with the swearing-in of Commissioner Anna Gomez.

Similar to the previous rules, FCC officials said they don't plan to impose rate regulation or "unbundling" requirements that would force broadband providers to share networks with other companies.

In a fact sheet, the FCC said the proposal would "establish basic rules for Internet Service Providers that prevent them from blocking legal content, throttling your speeds, and creating fast lanes that favor those who can pay for access."

California enforces net neutrality rules that mirror what the FCC adopted in 2015 and beat industry attempts to get the state law overturned.

Rosenworcel said that because FCC authority is generally centered on phone systems instead of broadband, the commission often needs "duct tape and baling wire" to provide legal justification for its rules.


The original article contains 843 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Smacks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Literally can't live without the internet these days. It needs to be a protected utility like any other.

[–] Cihta@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The article mentions CA still enforcing net neutrality rules. How does that work? Eventually you have to hop outside the state for many services.. are those backbones required to abide by those rules or can they still throttle as a result being out of state?

I firmly believe in all data being treated equally for the record and I hope this gets fixed. ISPs were kind of slow on throttling but it's becoming more and more obvious in the last couple years in my experience.

[–] erranto@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Couldn't they have done it earlier ? instead of waiting until the elections ?

[–] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago

No. The Republicans have stalled confirming a replacement until just now. Up until now the committee has been dead locked with 2 Democrats and two Republicans.

load more comments
view more: next ›