this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
107 points (84.5% liked)

Today I Learned

17770 readers
1183 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well yes, as it stands this is currently only showing correlation and not causation, but that doesn't mean there ISN'T causation. Amount of rainfall correlates with umbrella usage, because amount of rainfall causes umbrella usage. You can't claim a causational relationship until causation is specifically proven, but until then it's reasonable to tentatively infer causation if the correlation fits with other evidence. In this case, mushroom use and not wasting your life on the grind fit the evidence enough to tentatively infer causation.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd rather do psilocybin than overtime too.

[–] Cat@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Air traffic controller here. I only work overtime on pysilocybin.

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Please take holding pattern over in by cloud that looks like a twirly swirly cat face”

"Please hold for purple dragon on southbound approach"

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah? That's not what I'd read earlier today. What I'd read earlier today is that it amounts to an average of 3.60 minutes a week less than non-users. I have a hard time imagining that as a strong correlation. I'm not sure how that'd be seriously considered a correlation at all. 3.60 minutes over the course of an entire week is basically nothing.

[–] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It can be strongly correlated, meaning there's a definite relationship between them, while still being not significant like 3.6 min over a week. Most things that you hear cause cancer are only ~ .1 % extra probability over a lifetime but still highly correlated.

[–] Opafi@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like, not to sound too stupid... But wouldn't 3.60 minutes be just 4 minutes?

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

3 minutes + 60% of 60 seconds, or rather 3 minutes and 36 seconds, makes 3.60 minutes.

3.6 minutes, not 3 minutes 60 seconds.

[–] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My brain is now unscrambled. Thank you

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

3:60, however ... is apparently some crazy shit about the rod of the lord's wrath. Stay safe.

[–] meggied90@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

3.6 minutes in the context of a 40 hour work week is a 0.15% increase in work. No sane person would consider that clinically significant. If they're claiming there's a significant difference of 0.15% between the groups, they're making shit up.

[–] o0joshua0o@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Maybe it expands your life perspective enough to make you seek fulfillment outside the grind.

[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago

Lifetime use, not just past use. I feel like that's important. Because that one time I took shrooms has had no impact on my current voluminous overtime work lol

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Stupid question: is the implication that psilocybin makes someone lazy or super efficient? Both could explain a reduction in overtime.

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I highly doubt this is a causal relationship like that.

Instead, I suspect that the kind of people who are open to trying mushrooms are the same kind of people who are more likely to prioritize work-life balance. And my guess is that the common characteristic between these two groups has something to do with self awareness.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

My first thought was they see more to life than overtime.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

These findings carry significant implications, especially in the context of the ongoing discussions about the decriminalization and legalization of psilocybin in various parts of the United States. While it might seem that reduced overtime work could be costly for organizations, it is also possible that employees who have used psilocybin may be more productive during their regular work hours, reducing the need for overtime to complete tasks.

However, it’s crucial to note that the study has limitations. The cross-sectional design doesn’t establish causality, and the data used are somewhat dated (employment information was not available in the NSDUH survey data from 2015 onward), possibly not fully reflecting current trends in psychedelic use and work habits.

“One major caveat of the study is the correlational nature of its findings,” Korman explained. “This means that we cannot know whether employees’ use of psilocybin lead to their reduced overtime hours worked. Furthermore, the psychological mechanism linking psilocybin use to employees’ overtime hours worked was not studied. The theoretical reasons why psilocybin use may be linked to employees’ overtime hours worked remains, therefore, untested.”

Info leaves a lot to be desired.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago
[–] cornholio@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I quit my job lol

[–] Anne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This seems like a really predictable correlation...