this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2022
30 points (89.5% liked)

Privacy

31833 readers
247 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] X_Cli@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 years ago

Well, that's not entirely wrong: the website owner is responsible for contracting with Cloudflare in the first place.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

is this true though? https://chaos.social/@sindastra/108714913157859617:

By default, Cloudflare does not block Tor users.

It really is the site admin who configures Cloudflare to block Tor.

This is like adding Tor exit node IPs to iptables, except they're using Cloudflare instead of >iptables. It's the site admin who really is responsible. You wouldn't blame iptables, either.

This is FUD.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Also it only does this if you're using cf proxy which is pointless if you're running tor.

[–] blkpws@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I browse normally by default using Tor network, Cloudflare is a bit slow with the initial validation, but I always get into any website.

Website owners can block users to access via Tor network without using Cloudflare services anyway ... so this isn't any problem about Cloudflare.

I think Google is still the worst with their infinite CAPTCHA validation. Before doing those CAPTCHA validations (which could take you like 10 minutes to complete them all) I rather close the link and ignore it exist, they don't block, but they make it impossible for Tor users.

[–] loki@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

you should use a SearX or searXNG instance instead of google anyway.

[–] Redo11@szmer.info 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Recaptcha is on more sites than just google

[–] noodlejetski@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] altair222@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is hilarious since the whole point of captcha is to verify if you're a human

[–] noodlejetski@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

you want more hilarious? you can configure the addon to use Google's own speech recognition engine.

[–] altair222@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Lmfao fucked

[–] Redo11@szmer.info 2 points 2 years ago

I tried it and it worked somewhat, but it still was finky

[–] blkpws@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

This is so cool, but still not working for me.

[–] blkpws@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I never use Google search engine. I use a forked SearX service.