this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023

371 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19090 readers

4562 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

outrageousmatter@lemmy.world

aidan@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

371

Jim Jordan Makes It Clear: The Biden Impeachment Inquiry Rests Entirely On a Widely Debunked Conspiracy Theory (www.mediaite.com)

submitted 1 year ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You know, it's kind of fascinating that this is happening. I fully believe they we should investigate wrongdoings, but Biden didn't storm the capitol, withhold supplies from Ukraine, store secret documents in his bathroom, etc. There's a bunch of Biden conspiracy theories that seem to never lose attention, but the things Trump is under scrutiny for is on public record.

Perhaps the "he did nothing wrong" rhetoric is so ingrained in some folks that they really think he was impeached and indicted for "no reason," therefore its just as legitimate to go after Biden for loose claims, too. Like maybe they simply can't flip on the switch that that lets them believe anything Trump has ever done was bad.

In my personal opinion, if you can't find 10 things you don't like about a politician, even ones you agree with, then you need to practice nuance and cognitive thought.

[–] letsalllovelain@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's populism. Donald Trump everytime he speaks, speaks to his constituents. Joe Biden addresses the whole room. Donald gets to say "these people on this side, with the blue name tag, those folks are bring our society to its knees" where Joe has to play "some of those red-tagged folk don't like change." It's a lack of historical context that makes the same event repeat over and over again, and societies repeat the cycle over and over again.

Many prominent Greek philosophers, then Roman philosophers, then French philosophers (and in-between) thought that the power structure naturally drifted from Monarchy->Republic->Anarchy->Monarchy ad infinitum. But I think that the only true constant here is lack of context. This type of soft-balling, easy to chew bs that dems propogate isn't popular, it isn't compelling, it isn't dramatic. It is mostly geniune, even if geniuenly worthless. And that doesn't play to a crowd filled with people who are willing to accept the first idea that drift into their hearing range.

The only thing that wins is fighting fire with fire. And after a certain point, was it worth it? Wouldn't things just be better if it wasn't so damn complicated? Let us return to the Earth that we so desparately categorize ourself as without.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 67 points 1 year ago

Let's take this a point at a time:

"The first is Hunter Biden was put on the Burisma board."

Well that's true.

"Second, he was put on that board with no qualifications."

That's false. He previously served on the board of Amtrak, appointed by President George W. Bush.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/hunter-biden-amtrak-tom-carper-joe-biden-2024-beau

"Third, Burisma, asked him, can you weigh in with DC to relieve the pressure we’re under from the prosecution, from the prosecutor here in Ukraine?"

That's false. The prosecutor in Ukraine was FAILING to investigate corruption, that's why the IMF wanted him removed. That's why the Ukranian ambassador from the US wanted him removed. That's why 100 members of Ukranian parliament wanted him removed.

https://www.rferl.org/a/why-was-ukraine-top-prosecutor-fired-viktor-shokin/30181445.html

https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-imf-demand-poroshenko-corruption/27545849.html

https://www.ft.com/content/e1454ace-e61b-11e9-9743-db5a370481bc

"And fourth, Joe Biden did just that. He leveraged our tax money to get the prosecutor fired."

That's true, after multiple levels of both the US and Ukranian governments asked for it to happen. Biden got it done.

"And that fourth fact is, is validation of what the confidential human source said in the 1023 form. So that is what is central to this case."

No, it isn't. The 1023 form is a statement of "someone told us x", it has no validation.

[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

The entire Republican party is a widely debunked conspiracy theory.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Gym's never heard a conspiracy theory he didn't like.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless the conspiracy involves child sexual abuse in an athetic program...

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

In that case Gym has never heard about such a thing in his life.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All they want is their ~~talking~~ yelling point to put on Fox.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they didn't have their culture wars, they'd have no culture at all.

[–] Wodge@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've seen more interesting culture in a discarded yogurt pot.

[–] theostermanweekend@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know....just bums me how the GOP is wasting out time with shit like this and with shit like trump, instead of working on actual problems like the environment, corporate malfeasance etc. Don't @me. I'm just venting.

[–] Entropywins@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

None of those are problems for the GOP...

[–] persolb@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are problems for them… even if they want to pretend those problems are hoaxes.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t think they are, though. They’re working together. And sometimes, they’re simply the same people.

[–] DrPop@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

But just time, taxpayer money, I already had I help find the war machine.

[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

THE Jim Jordan? The Jim Jordan that ignored and whitewashed child sex abuse?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Believe it or not, yes.

[–] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Makes sense since facts are "woke" to Republicans and conspiracy theories are for "real men"

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm not American. But I do wish the United States would be more united again.

Feels like a one-step forward, three-steps back sort of deal for a while now. Not what you want seeing happen to friends

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

How can anyone unite with these fucksticks who want to turn America into a christofascist country.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

The inherent problem is this:

Republicans in power:
"We're the majority! Elections have consequences! You have to do it OUR way or YOU aren't being 'bipartisan'!"

Republicans not in power:
"We're the minority! You have to do it OUR way or YOU aren't being 'bipartisan'!"

Democrats:
"We COULD call them out on their bullshit, but that would be 'uncivil'. When they go low, we go high..." And get their asses kicked from below.