this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
187 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
4602 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ayaya@lemdro.id 117 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is the year of the Jellyfin desktop

[–] micka190@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Year of the enshitification, more like.

It feels like every company just decided 2023 was the year they finally pulled the trigger and tried to cash-out and bail.

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (6 children)

With Plex adding "Live TV" and all the other shit for the past 6 years, their enshittification isn't new. Most people I know still on Plex are only doing so because they paid for a lifetime pass. They're full on sunk-cost-fallacy.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tech has always been geared towards losing money to provide a valuable service but the understanding from investors who don't loan for free is that at some point you turn on the profit engine. Some tech companies are able to generate revenue without necessarily making their product awful for users, but the more pull and pressure investors have, and the more driven by impatience, the enshittifier things become.

The Fed turning off the free money tap last year by starting to raise interest rates was an inevitable wake up call for investors that they needed to change their model to start profiting or at least lose less. Many, many companies, users and products are experiencing US's investors-first-and-only capitalism's inevitable end; it destroys the good it created. Companies without long-term investors or leverage to hold off investors willing to kill the golden goose either enshittify, or if they don't have a way to enshittify, go under.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Interest rates. No free money.

[–] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Interest rates went up and the flood of money from investors went down.

Investors are probably demanding a return on their massive amounts of speculative investing in the tech industry.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

There seems to be a pattern in services like this where they launch as a good idea that's under priced and take off like a rocket, then growth levels off as everyone is either already using the service or never will regardless of what they do. Once you reach that point, however, you still need to show revenue growth because capitalism, so if you can't get more users you either have to make the service more expensive for the users you have, or cheaper to run. The former we see happening all over the place, and the latter is actually a good thing in limited amounts as unnecessary parts are trimmed off, but will almost always also result in useful features being axed. Hence why everything seems to be getting more expensive and worse.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s great. Clean, minimal. Love it. Plex is like a titanic. Way too much heft for me. It’s also corporate, so hard pass

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would be on Jellyfin now if they had a good Xbox app.

[–] SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lack of an official tvOS app and Plex being easy to set up for my family keeps me from switching.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I made the switch this week. Jellyfin took about 10 minutes to set up and left it overnight to scan my files. I only had to make a few corrections.

You can always try it out in a VM or container or even run both at once.

You can cast it onto a chrome cast though I haven't tried this yet.

[–] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It has to be as easy as plex is for watching for me to switch, otherwise my wife won't go for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Owljfien@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago

Casting is as easy as it is on plex, I have a plex lifetime pass and can't think of anything useful it does that jellyfin can't do too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would love to switch but there's two things stopping me: Less support (if any?) for multi-users and remote access, and less app support especially when transcoding is needed. Also would be nice to not lose Overseerr when switching, I'm sure there's a fork of that though.

[–] maxprime@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Putting Jellyfin behind a reverse proxy and making multiple users are both well supported features.

And wait until you hear about Jellyseer!

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I suppose it might be time to try! Last I tried Jellyfin, multiuser wasn't really a thing.

[–] ayaya@lemdro.id 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And while there is less app support in terms of clients the transcoding is actually better. It doesn't need a Plex Pass for hardware transcoding and it has way more options. You can do things like encode in H.265 (if the client supports it) and fine tune the tonemapping for HDR.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is virtually akin to banning AWS or DO. Hetzner are a legitimate and widely used cloud platform.

This is akin to Google blocking Verizon because of some spam calls. A ridiculous premise that shows huge immaturity on Plex's part.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

"a large number of Plex users use the software in violation of its Terms of Service (section "Content and Acceptable Use", bullet items 1 and/or 6), therefore all users will henceforth be banned from using Plex."

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nah, actually we as the plex community need to pull our heads out of our asses and remember that the internet was doing just fine before cloud service providers came along.

If you're not self-hosting, it's not your server.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

“Never trust a machine you can’t throw out a window.” - Steve Wozniak

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Pirates will move to self hosted if they can still turn a profit, which they can.

Self hosting is easy and convenient and doesn't require a lot of technical knowledge. Plex are literally harming their own business model by driving away non-technical users with a sledgehammer solution that no one likes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echo64@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feels like plex are heading towards removing sharing media altogether. I wouldn't use it if they removed that functionality.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same.

I've been pretty happy with Emby as my backup plan.

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Jellyfin is Emby minus the cost. Literally a fork of Emby that has far surpassed it at this point. Emby did that thing where they took an open source project and locked it behind a paywall for access, and I won't support the Rent-your-software model.

[–] leotonius@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm legitimately curious as to what has changed with Jellyfin, with comparing to Emby, that would make this statement true: "that has far surpassed it at this point"

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That's more on the featureset that's available without having to rent it from Emby. Hardware Transcoding, DVR, Live TV, Cinema Intros, Automatic Metadata, Offline Files, that kind of thing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay so serious question here.

Why does Plex get to make this decision?

I don't use Plex. But if they CAN do this, it seems to me there must be some unnecessary cloud dependence in Plex.

A good media server IMHO does not need a cloud connection, it should just work on your local network.

[–] waitmarks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yes, they have a centralized login system. It’s my biggest issue with plex and why i am experimenting with switching to jellyfin.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been running Jellyfin since around it's inception - highly recommend! Not quite as feature heavy as Plex yet, but an excellent community.

[–] protput@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you also have experience with Emby? Not sure yet on what to choose. Guess I'm going to try them both.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Glad I self host all my media

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While I can totally sympathize with a company needing to take measures to curtail piracy and appease property owners, this is like burning down a house to put our a candle.

I personally self host so this won't be a problem for me, but they're gonna hit a lot of people who hosted at this domain, that weren't participating in illegal activities.

I guess Plex must have saw it as prevalent enough to warrant a total ban, it was either really bad, or they're being overzealous.

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

To be frank, how do you even use Plex without pirating? Ripping your own DVDs and Blurays? And if so, isn't that sort of considered piracy by the powers that be?

[–] Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, and no. In theory, you could absolutely "back up" any physical media you have to prevent wear and tear to the disc, which is a completely legitimate use case. And it's not considered piracy because by buying that media, you purchased the legal rights to use it for personal viewing. However, if you ever gave a copy of that rip to another person (or gave that disc away to someone else without deleting your rips), you would be commiting piracy.

In fact, I believe that even viewing the media alongside another person is technically not allowed, although clearly that's not enforced unless you're doing some sort of public showing.

[–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

In the USA at least, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act made circumventing copy protection mechanisms illegal. Basically every DVD and Blu-ray disc implements those, so every backup copy we make is illegal even though it should be covered by fair use.

They stripped us of our rights and made protecting our purchases illegal through the back door, so we have the moral obligation to ignore that law.

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I use it for my own dvds/blu-rays, yeah. This is technically still considered piracy, but my personal view is that I'm fine paying for something once because the people who made it deserve to get paid, but I'm not fine paying for the same thing multiple times when the effort on their end to make the new version was basically zero. It would be one thing if there were physical costs like going from vhs to dvd, but that's not the case here.

[–] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I have a mix. Ripping your own is in line with format shifting. Putting a cad into a cassette for use in your car that didn’t have a cd player is the old school equivalent. I believe it is a valid fair use case.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JasSmith@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Some people are quite shameless about selling Plex access, but playing hosting whack-a-mole is a losing game.

[–] quantum_mechanic@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good. There are people out there who ruin all the nice things. Just host your own damn server and download your own content like a normal person.

[–] Anon819450514@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fine Line of piracy is don't make money out of it. That's my hard line

[–] ruckblack@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Yep. That's my line too. The folks running paid servers are ruining it for the rest of us.

Exactly. Though usually once somebody does, that's when the authorities get involved.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Why use plex when jellyfin exist?

I'm more than happy with my jellyfin server knowing nobody can block it against my will.

load more comments
view more: next ›