this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16749 readers
3 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

when not connected, i get 400mbps. connected to mullvad, i only get 150mbps

the server isnt very far from me physically (sub 100miles) and says it can support 1gbps. any way to fix or is this just an inherent flaw with vpns? using wireguard

on windows 11

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's normal with VPNs. You are sharing bandwidth with other users when you use it, so you lose speed.

[–] papabobolious@feddit.nu 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my experience Mullvad is a blazing fast VPN, to me this seems like something else. I never had less than 500mbit speeds using it.

[–] Aggy@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I experience closer to 100mb/s generally. Though this is plenty for me. I'm really just glad my ping stays below 30ms.

[–] strawberry@artemis.camp 5 points 1 year ago

understandable, thanks

[–] PeachMan@lemmy.one 31 points 1 year ago

Very standard with any VPN, I'd say 150Mbps is quite good compared to the competition. You're sending your network traffic through a tunnel to another location, then they're relaying it to other places. There are several bottlenecks along the way.

[–] ollie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

400 to 150... to the speedtest server?

[–] strawberry@artemis.camp 5 points 1 year ago

my bad that wording was fucked

when not connected, i get 400mbps. connected to mullvad, i only get 150mbps

[–] strawberry@artemis.camp 1 points 1 year ago

what

it drops from 400mbps to 150mbps when using a speed test

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 10 points 1 year ago

The mullvad server might have a gigabit connection, but that shared across all their users.

[–] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

WireGuard will get you the best through put, IPSEC is a close second. OpenVPN has a lot of overhead.

[–] Kuro@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Are you using the same server between the two speed tests?

[–] giacomo@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

What protocol?

[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How much speed do you need? That is still a lot of bandwidth. This is from someone with 8 mbps up/ 60 mbps down. So your still way better then I am. I am envious. Well no so much as this is enough for me.

Other thing to keep in mind is that bandwidth is only half of performance, latency is the other. So check that too.

[–] strawberry@artemis.camp 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yea latency was like 30ms so good enough. 150mbps is usually plenty, I'll just be turning it off when downloading a game for example

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know the limits of the mullvad client but you might want to look into split tunneling and just allow steam (or whatever program) to avoid the VPN... the privacy benefits are going to be marginal, the latency and download speed penalties will be blatantly obvious.

[–] MajesticFlame@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

As dark ark say, the official mullvad app allows split tunneling. I have split tunneling enabled for things where I am logged in with my real identity. No point hiding my IP from steam when they have my credit card number with my name.

[–] letmesleep@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Have you tried different servers (you can select country and city in the app)? Have you tried it on different days of the week at different times?

That would be my starting to find out where the bottle-neck is. Under optimal conditions Mullvad should get very close to your 400mps (the protocol has some overhead, but in a speed test with "full" packages that's only about five percent of your bandwidth). Of course they can't guarantee optimal conditions on all servers all the time, but it's also not rare for them to get close.

The distance to the Mullvad server doesn't matter much when it comes to bandwidth. Hence, unless you're gaming and actually need a short ping, you can try servers that are further away.

If you don't get anything higher than 150Mb/s at any time with any server, we'll indeed have to look for technical issues on your side.

[–] Surp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mullvads no good anymore especially since they removed the ability for choosing a temporary port to open.

[–] strawberry@artemis.camp 2 points 1 year ago

so what do I switch to?

[–] PublicLewdness@burggit.moe 1 points 1 year ago

I've never used a VPN where I didn't get a big drop in speed. Privacy and security don't mesh well with speed in most cases.

[–] NECOdes@burggit.moe 1 points 1 year ago

weird, amongst vpns I've used, Mullvad was the fastest one