this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1321 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
5228 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google enables advertisers a look into your browsing history...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 202 points 1 year ago (10 children)

It's disgusting. Users browser history is private, just like their search history. Fuck Google.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 69 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Exactly. If Google wants to collect user data and use it for their products, they should be paying users. You can't build and sell cars without paying for the nuts and bolts, yet Google has been taking their materials for free.

[–] TheEntity@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not for free, for a browser. This doesn't make it any less evil.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

That's not the deal though. It's not an exchange of data for the use of the product, like you would exchange money for a product or service. The product is offered free of charge, and alongside that they collect whatever they can get away with. There's no consideration, there's no proportionality, it doesn't meet the basic tenets of contract law.

Data companies thrive in this hazy grey zone where regulations haven't been made. However, when you compare what they do to anything else, it's clearly unreasonable. If I invite you into my home, that doesn't mean I give you permission to take the strawberries from my garden. If you invite me into your home, that doesn't mean you get permission to go through my wallet and take photos of everything inside.

It's getting worse, look at Microsoft now. You pay them for the software and they still take your data.

Data needs to be regulated, such that users are fairly compensated and more properly in control of it. Either that, or it must be completely open - Google can collect the data, but their raw database must be freely available to everyone. Lobbying has proven effective for Google et al, however there is some small hope because law makers themselves are also the victims - everyone is. They just need to realise the true value of what's being taken from them.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] cyd@lemmy.world 166 points 1 year ago (17 children)

"Enhanced Ad Privacy." That's the technology that, unless switched off, allows websites to target the user with adverts tuned to their online activities

That's some Orwellian shit right there.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] bappity@lemmy.world 131 points 1 year ago (13 children)

every day I'm glad I switched to firefox

[–] glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

I may be cursed but I have never experienced any slowdown with Firefox. I never noticed the appeal of Chrome, but have I only used it twice in my life…

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] igorlogius@lemmy.world 109 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

I’ve never left Firefox. Through their redesigns and restructure of available add-ons, Firefox has always been the better option because they’ve always been focused on user options and user privacy.

"I don’t want my browser keeping track of my browsing history to help serve me ads, and I definitely don’t want my browser sharing any function of my browsing history with every random website I visit.”

Then why were you using Chrome in the first place?? This feels very much like “‘I never thought the leopards would eat my face,’ says the head of the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party.”

Every single product offered by Google is meant as an ad delivery method to increase their balance sheet. I’m honestly shocked by the people who are shocked when Google takes steps that are meant to increase ad delivery when that’s always been Google’s ultimate goal.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 93 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This was overwhelming rejected by everyone, including Microsoft, Mozilla, Safari, and others. It's universally disliked, and Google knows this, but they intentionally know they're abusing their monopoly to push anti-consumer bullshit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 92 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Why not just use Firefox (while you still can ...)

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 86 points 1 year ago (10 children)

"don't be evil" days have been over since forever ago.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Carion@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

2056

  • Plug DNA access into pc

  • Google sync my brain chip with my browser page

  • Start searching new brain plague of 2043

  • Google show ad pop-up in my eyes, try to close them, but the ads are projected on the optic nerve.

  • New ideia

  • scan anti-ad chip that my friend gave me

  • It works, I'm free

  • anyway, try to order food

  • Error the system is not autenticated please install chrome chiplinx 3.8 to continue.

  • Receive fine of half my salary, new policy under anti-piracy order

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please drink verification can

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

That's fine. I'll continue to use Firefox.

[–] UdeRecife@lemmy.sdfeu.org 59 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's crazy to think that this level of intrusion is considered fair game. The way these behaviors are normalized is completely dystopian.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's absolutely insane that this is legal. This type of spying is explicitly forbidden in the constitution of the United States of America, but since it's a private corporation it's suddenly okay? The FBI has been known to purchase information about consumers from private corporations. This is a back door around the 4th amendment. Actually since corporations are essentially governing by proxy, buying laws and legislatures, this is a constitutional violation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CummandoX@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (7 children)

So glad I moved to Firefox, fu Google

[–] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

Mobile has extensions too. Ublock on Firefox mobile is a god send.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 year ago
[–] dulce_3t_decorum_3st@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I assumed this was happening for years

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I'll just invite Google to come get my dna, set up cameras everywhere, and install a microchip in my brain. Then I can be done with this slow-walk of privacy invasion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stormblessed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yet the simps still won’t use Firefox

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well that's what to expect from a web browser created by an advertising company.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kn100@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago (14 children)

And yet Firefox marketshare will keep dwindling. Drives me mad!

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (7 children)

How about not using Chrome? Firefox Gang!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] halfempty@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A few years ago, I switched from Firefox to Chrome. A few months ago, I switched back to Firefox. Chrome is rolling out changes which are completely unacceptable, such as making adblockers impossible, and using my private browsing history for their own ads.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chrome is like Facebook, zero respect for privacy. Anything you do with Chrome can and will be used. From day one Chrome has fed all your browsing activity to their index bot. After your browsed a URL, shortly after googlebot crawled that site.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Let me get this straight:

Until now, Google and other advertisers stored cookies on your device and tracked your browsing history on their servers.

Know, everything happens locally and this is somewhat worse then the old way to do it?

How?

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No. Now Google straight up monopolizes your browser history instead of trying to guess your interests.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] InternetTubes@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

Even if Google isn't out to exploit this, basically the people running the ads can. John Oliver sort of did this, but geographically: https://youtu.be/wqn3gR1WTcA?si=GBKBNrQ-x0QKvwBh&t=1390

This will expose your user data. This will allow you to get targeted, and it will allow you to get targeted for long term interests versus short term ones. God forbid someone with a political agenda ever decides to act on this data ...

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] BeefDaddySupreme@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I figured they did this already just without saying it out loud

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] philodendron@lemdro.id 29 points 1 year ago (10 children)

In Chrome, start at the three dots in the upper-right corner and go to Settings > Privacy and Security > Ad privacy. (Or just type chrome://settings/adPrivacy into your address field.) The ad privacy page lets you turn off Chrome's targeted ads.

As per The Verge

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Got this today, I have to use chrome for a couple things every month, and they conveniently turned on all their tracking and ads and bullshit. Had to turn all that crap off again. Not that they'd glean any useful information from my paltry chrome usage, but it still pisses me off.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Cyo@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I'm glad I stopped using chrome / chromium a long time ago.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

Not my browser history. I use private browsing... and Firefox!

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Damn advertisers are finally gonna realize how fucking lonely I am is keeping me from being a better consumer and has me resenting capitalism and they'll work to change my sad life, right? Privatize the profits, socialize the losses, isolate the losers. Got it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Interesting tidbit: I've been watching "the big bang theory" a lot these past few weeks on my own hosted jellyfin install.

I don't use google search anywhere, I don't type tbbt anywhere. Yet, on my Android phone I have this obligatory Google news thing when I swipe left (HATE that) and all of the sudden that thing got chock full of chatgpt written TBBT articles... I don't really go there (usually end up there by accident swiping left once too many) and I don't read those articles but it really obviously switched to TBBT articles when I switched to watching TBBT.

This really kinda freaks me out and makes me wonder WTF more google is monitoring. I use a Google Chromecast, I guess google monitors that?

[–] squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

That and your phone's microphone and other sensors.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It should always be opt in, not opt out. Leave chrome in favor of a non-chrome browser, such as firefox.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] art@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Who knew that using a browser made by an ad agency would result in ads?!
shockedpikachuface.webp

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tjtherealbest@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Everyone talks about Firefox. And that's cause Firefox is good and hands down the best. But I've been using Vivaldi which is chromium based for years. Anyone have any opinion on Vivaldi?

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›