this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
719 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's not resigning from a position that is a lifetime appointment.

So sick of hearing these moronic articles.

Either get the goddamn Department of Justice or IRS involved in this and see if these trips and other gifts were illegal, or STFU. Yes, we all know he's a corrupt piece of shit, but he's not resigning, and it sure as hell doesn't look like any governmental departments even want to try going after him for corruption.

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These "Moronic articles" places him into the spotlight.

There is very few things that can be considered an "Annoyance" to rich folk, being in that spotlight is one of them.

People like Clarence Thomas want to go on vacation and not worry about being recognized in public.

Being in the spotlight means they have to hire more security, it means background checks, it means more people in your private life, it means always looking over your shoulder because the "media" is everyone with a smart phone nowadays.

So while I would love to see less topics on Clarence Thomas that doesn't involve a jail cell. The attention on his shadiness, is the 2nd best for now.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, you are not the target audience for this article.

Most Americans are not informed at all, and no matter how stupid it may seem, they need the most watered down solution shoved in their face repeatedly just so they recognize the problem in the first place

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Clarence Thomas resign

YES

calls

Oh…

Haha, that was me as well. I need to read the whole text before getting emotional 🙄

[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He won't resign because the bar to remove him is too great. Now if they prosecuted him for tax evasion, that could get him off the bench before he dies.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The case will go all the way to the Supreme Court!

[–] starkzarn@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago

😆 God the judiciary is fucked up...

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dissolve the court. Arrest Gorsuch, Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh. Bring in an independent investigator and if any of the others have so much as gotten a ride to their car from someone with business before the court arrest them too. No more "well it's only a little bit corrupt" or "yeah but you've gotta understand" or that horse shit. You want your word to be the literal law that almost 400 million people have to live under? You need to be fucking flawless.

[–] profdc9@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Now that Thomas's image can not get any worse, he's just going to become more overt about trying to destroy the US government from the bench. That's all that will happen.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why are we waiting on a resignation? Kick him the fuck out.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Flip the chair over. He's like 60-something.

Use a buddy before lifting anything over 75lbs though.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

Requesting him to resign is the same thing as asking cancer to just… please leave.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he won't resign unless he is compelled by the law or court order. there are too many people who have invested in him for him to just walk away.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is literally no court aside from SCOTUS that can compel him to resign.

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, he could be impeached. Simple majority in the house and 2/3 in the senate though, iirc. Don’t see that happening any time soon.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Republicans hold the house for now, so that's absolutely not happening, esp. since the poorly-name "Freedom Caucus" would immediately move to remove McCarthy if he even brought it to the floor for a vote.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

you betcha. he's going nowhere.

[–] hoi_polloi@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

Harlan Crow is such a comic book vilain name too. Maybe it makes me think of the Harlans in altered carbon.

[–] Metriximor@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Why would he resign? Like really why would he do it. You can't force him to, his time won't run out and corpos and lobbying will never let any sort of political entity take him from his place.

Dude is there until death you can cry all you want but he's not leaving.

I will gladly be wrong about this btw but I know i probably won't.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only way he'll ever leave his position is feet first. Just like RBG and Scalia.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He has literally stated his life goal is to "make liberals' lives miserable" because some Catholic priest wannabes were racist to him in seminary.

Which would be cool of him if he'd like, not picked the bootlicking side. Or if he wasn't doing what those miserable dicks wanted? Or knew what a liberal was?

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Maybe a system where someone can be this openly corrupt while making decisions for a large group of people shouldn't exist?

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I skimmed the title and saw "Clarence Thomas resigns over calls [...]" and my first thought was "I can't believe it took this long."

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless there are dramatic political reforms, you'll be waiting the rest of his life.

You can't shame him out of office. If he felt shame, he wouldn't have taken so many bribes in the first place.

It's why lifetime appointments to powerful positions are a stupid idea.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What made sense 300 years ago may not make a lot of sense in 2023.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did it make sense 300 years ago? Just so you couldn't fire judges you didn't like?

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Why did it make sense 300 years ago?

Because it did.

300 years ago.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Can any overly-conservative and/or overly-corporate decision that was 5:4 thanks to him be recalled, too?

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Clarence hears ya.

Clarence don’t care.

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

That would be ethical and the right thing to do so there's no way in hell that corrupt sex pest would ever resign.

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 10 points 1 year ago

There is literally nothing compelling him to resign and if he did resign under democrat rule, the republicans would make sure that he will never feel safe again.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

we will never have better way this show is playing out even biden does it with clarence's age and job security and the people that are to supposed to check and balance each other doing the same bs and people voting for the same people this might never change

if people really truly cared about living better there would be riots the in streets over all the current mess or lack of votes for the demopublicans

might be some propaganda article out soon to smooth this over out by your local news which is owned by the same megacorp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McClatchy it might read out that the "insert scapegoat here" are to blame for this immorality not poor clarence and we as citizens will be back at each other's throats instead just like other times in our history all over the world

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Calls for Justice Clarence Thomas to resign have intensified after documents released this week revealed more trips gifted to the U.S. Supreme Court by wealthy benefactor Harlan Crow.

"This late-come effort at 'Clean-up on Aisle Three' won't deter us from fully investigating the massive, secret, right-wing billionaire influence in which this Court is enmired," wrote Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island.

Earlier this year, ProPublica—a New York-based non-profit, independent newsroom conducting investigative journalism in the public interest—revealed that Thomas had accepted gifts from friend Crow, a Republican donor, for the past two decades.

The trips included a voyage on a yacht around the Bahamas, several private jet and helicopter flights, luxury stays and a dozen VIP passes to professional college sporting events, among others.

In the aftermath of the revelations by ProPublica, which sparked outrage among members of the public and Democratic lawmakers and questions over increasing ethics requirements for Supreme Court justices, Thomas defended himself, saying he had always "always sought to comply with the disclosure guidelines."

A group of House Democrats, including New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland calling for the DOJ to launch an internal inquiry into Thomas's billionaire-funded trips.


The original article contains 587 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He's not resigning unless there's a Republican president + Senate to replace him; all we can do is hope that that doesn't happen until he dies of natural causes. (and that the Democrats triumph in the election after that, so we don't end up with a Scalia->Garland->Gorsuch situation again)

[–] t3h_fool@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a good article anywhere that directly draws the line between cases he has seen and perks he has been given? I know that he should have to declare all of the trips, etc, and that that is a big problem. But I am interested in how he has directly damaged democracy in more obvious quid pro quo. I am especially interested in having an answer to anyone that tries to minimize what he has done.

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I mean look up every case the heritage foundation has brought to the supreme court.

[–] books@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

He'll just ignore the calls and life will continue.

[–] arefx@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

He will NEVER resign. No matter what.

[–] Potato_in_my_anus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

He won't resign, he's gonna wait until the next election.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I thought that the US Constitution was an awesome document that in hundreds of years only needed a few changes to stay relevant.

Well, I was wrong.

The US Constitution is in dire need from at least four amendments if not completely re-written every damn generation.

And the USAians need to understand that these rights are not created by the government or the document but rather extent from being Human Beings and that laws protect residents FROM the government not the government from residents.