I wonder if emulating the Switch version makes it more accesible to most players.
Patient Gamers
A gaming community free from the hype and oversaturation of current releases, catering to gamers who wait at least 12 months after release to play a game. Whether it's price, waiting for bugs/issues to be patched, DLC to be released, don't meet the system requirements, or just haven't had the time to keep up with the latest releases.
^(placeholder)^
I hear it's better graphically. I'm considering trying it out, despite having played it on my Xbox 360 just a couple years ago, just to see how it is.
I'm not going to pay for the Switch version though, because I think Rockstar is being really scummy with this rollout (charging full release price for a simple port 10+ years after release, and no PC port, improvements, etc). So I guess I'll go sail the seven seas to give it a try so I can decide if it's worth recommending to friends.
I loved RDR2 and have been meaning to check out the first one. Is the open world / do whatever the hell you want gameplay there in the first one?
I’d say so yeah. I personally prefer the first one, though the second is obviously great as well. I played the first one after the second one too. RDR2 probably has the better world for just messing around, but I preferred completing the first one.
Yep, the open world is all there. If you’ve done the post game in RDR 2 where you get the new areas to explore (Blackwater and everything west of it), that’s all from RDR 1. The first game also includes Mexico which is only accesible in RDR2 with glitches or mods
I wonder if you're better off playing RDR with Xenia or RPCS3? I've never used Xenia, personally.