this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
297 points (93.3% liked)

World News

32509 readers
535 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 79 points 1 year ago (40 children)

Just an endless slew of clickbait "China bad" headlines all the time. Really makes you wonder about if there is some sort of systemic problem with western media.

[–] Novman@feddit.it 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Be careful, saying something like that might get you called a wumao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 48 points 1 year ago

If you want to see consent being manufactured, go into the Telegraph and click through to the journalist's ~~post history~~ article history

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago

It's going to be hilarious in a year or so when we'll have LLM bots churning these types of articles out even at respected news outlets, and all critics of this narrative will still get smeared as being bots themselves

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] anoncpc@hexbear.net 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, if you go to aliexpress, you could buy Chinese made helicopter, drones and metals. Thank you the telegraph for the basic info

[–] Fuckass@hexbear.net 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If you search for certain military equipment, you’ll often see reviews from Russian soldiers and Ukrainian soldiers right next to each other lol

[–] anoncpc@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

Like, the yank was so mad at Ukrainian keep using Chinese drone, that they force them to stop buying it and use their expensive drone.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Frank@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

That's gotta be in some cyberpunk book somewhere. Especially if they start giving different ratings to the equipment and flaming each other over it.

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (74 children)

China: sends Russia six helicopters (before the war), some children's toys, a box of consumer-grade hunting scopes, and metal. They are the bad guys who are prolonging the war.

NATO: sends Ukraine weapons and military vehicles worth more than China's entire military budget, and provides training and logistics support. They are the good guys trying to end the war.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago

The liberals only read the titles and then come straight to the comment sections so they don't actually realise any of this unless you spell it out for them.

load more comments (73 replies)
[–] robbotlove@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (37 children)

when Russia becomes the third world nation in a proxy war.

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] CloutAtlas@hexbear.net 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Focusing on Chinese drones that end up in Russia while completely ignoring the Chinese drones that end up in the Ukraine is some cherry picking I expected from the Telegraph. Products and components are made in China, which shouldn't come as a surprise.

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 35 points 1 year ago (11 children)

This is referring to consumer level drones too right? Like DJI stuff?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mar_k@hexbear.net 50 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Telegraph is the only one reporting this, we're supposed to believe a sensationalist conservative tabloid?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jonhanson@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

China is widely suspected of supplying Russia with equipment and materials to support their war, however no-one has adduced anything concrete to support that theory so far.

The article itself doesn't cite much in the way of sources or evidence, other than mentioning a report by Molfar, the open source intelligence agency. Molfar has published reports on the same topic in the past, but there hasn't been anything recently.

If the Telegraph had new information or evidence they would be shouting a lot louder than this. This is most likely them covering up for a quiet day by dredging up some old rumours and repackaging them as news.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Staines@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago (12 children)

telegraph getting upset about free markets?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] o_d@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 1 year ago (25 children)

Beijing issued a 12-point “peace statement” earlier this year that rehashed its position and did not propose any solutions to ending the war.

You obviously didn't read it then...

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] FARTYSHARTBLAST@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whaaat? But China said they weren't doing that. China wouldn't just lie like that, would it?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›