this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5108 readers
563 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
20
Death rates from energy production per TWh (ourworldindata.org)
submitted 1 year ago by Thrawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/climate@slrpnk.net
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

First post on the fediverse. Hopefully it auto loads the link photo but if not I'll put it as the first comment. Sorry for anything incorrect in handling this.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Convincing greens to be anti-nuclear is one of the greatest tricks the fossil fuel industry ever pulled

[–] moosepuggle@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

This about sums it up

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Even better they convinced a bunch of people that all other green ideas are stupid, due to greens being anti nuclear. Hence they get both, no nuclear and no renwables, evs, public transport and the other sensible ideas of the greens.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Link looks fine. I wish that it was just deaths from air pollution. I can't imagine "accidents" being that much of an impact.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

For nuclear it does, depening how many cancer deaths have been caused by mainly Chernobyl. That is however massivly disputed, as it thankfully only ever happend once and well the Soviets had no intresst in actually being honest about that. Depending on the measures that can be thousands of deaths, due to an accident.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 year ago

Idunno, lots of deadly accidents amongst coal miners and offshore oil rig workers, to name a couple..

[–] TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

This is sad. After all humanity doesn't care about a humans life, if they save money.