Radio Free Asia, a broadcasting service which aims to get the bottom of propaganda put out by totalitarian countries, interviewed an anonymous resident.
Goddamnit
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
16 points (75.0% liked)
World News
32285 readers
1112 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I always blindly trust CIA New International
This sounds extremely fake.
The source for this? Radio Free Asia interviewed one (1) anonymous person.
If you read this “journalism” uncritically you are literally the npc meme.
What the actual fuck is leaking into brains that makes people read this shit and make them completely forgo the “is this propaganda” question.
The CIA would never lie to me, and I'm offended that you'd imply otherwise.
Video uploaded August 14 by a north Korean showing Koreans wearing shorts.
I am a more qualified journalist than Saskia O'Donoghue it seems.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/tq7iUQu0Y2g
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
The Reactionary Ideology and Culture Rejection Act of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was amended August 19th.
You’re apparently a shit journalist.
Post the law's text from an official source then.
How long until an article comes out saying it's mandatory to wear shorts in the DPRK?
Supreme Leader of North Korea Mandates Shorts
Dec. 15, 2023
A recent report by Radio Free Asia states all citizens are required to wear shorts despite the cold weather. According to the anonymous source, famed news presenter Ri Chun-hee was quoted as saying, "They're comfy and easy to wear." The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has not yet responded to interview requests.
Tankies are out in full force today I see..
I'm as anti American as they get, but to go from that to pretending that any and all reports about places that happen to be anti-American (but in no shape or form pro anyone but the dictator and his minions) must be false because "CIA" (who actually do legit horrific things but tankies sleep during those) is the most not only ridiculous (and so so fucking western, which is ironic af), but actively counterproductive stance I could imagine taking.
I understand why people are skeptical. The source is Radio Free Asia which is literal US propaganda. I’m not super familiar with their reporting standards though. Even propaganda can have different levels of trustworthiness.
The only people who call Radio Free Asia in to question are those looking to deny the Uyghur genocide.
I don’t think it should be dismissed but it’s important to keep in mind that its primary goal is to promote the interests of the US government. That doesn’t mean it’s false but what stories they cover and the way they are covered will reflect that agenda.
No shit, but every story covered by any outlet reflects a fucking agenda, that's the point of propaganda.
That still doesn't explain the apologist tankie dumpster fire happening in these comments.
Seriously, what does it take in someone's brain to switch and go "I know, today I'll make excuses for an evil authoritarian regime!", and what does it take to then be a level down and make excuses for them?
LOL radio free Asia is LITERALLY a military intelligence operation. What are you fucking talking about? Everyone and their mother should be dismissing RFA for literally everything.
For example, this article written by an operative that uses an anonymous interview as their sole source. Let's do some basic critical thinking here. How long have women worn shorts in DPRK do you think? How many pairs of shorts exist in the DPRK?
Now, what is the point of sanctions? It's to create discontent in the masses so they will be more willing to undermine the country's leadership. What would banning shorts for women, after decades of shorts wearing, do to the level of contentedness of women and the men who support them? It would decrease their contentedness making them more susceptible to US influence. This move would be very much not in keeping with any former moves by the DPRK who is focused entirely on keeping their people content enough to not revolt.
But how do sanctions work? Economic hardship, reduced access to materials and goods. What happens when you ban shorts for half your pop? They all need to obtain more pants and skirts. So now you have an economic pressure to expend more labor and more resources just to deal with a whimsical ban for the purposes of oppressing half your nation?
No. This is a stupid concept at every single level and only raging orientalists who suckle at the teat of Western anti-Asian propaganda would believe it, let alone get angry at people for not believing it immediately
Bro is so brainwashed they think North Korea banned shorts 💀
Good. Short content is brain rotting
Counterpoint: shorts are hot
So the CIA interviewed a single anonymous person who probably doesn't even exist. Cool journalism!
BrikoX you posted Radio Free Asia. 💀
I hate north korea as much as the next guy but this don't sound too real to me brotha imma be honest
What world do you live in where misogynistic dress codes imposed by a patriarchal society are somehow "unbelievable"?
Why are you so quick to believe RFA propaganda?
Because tankies can’t accept that these regimes aren’t actually good for the people living under them.
I think this is fake because it's stupid af
why are you people so quick to defend an oppressive state?
Seriously? Doubting a ridiculous article about fashion with absolutely no sources is "defense of an oppressive state"? Is critical thinking now considered wrongthink here?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Radio Free Asia, a broadcasting service which aims to get the bottom of propaganda put out by totalitarian countries, interviewed an anonymous resident.
Although the regime in North Korea demands total loyalty to Jong-Un, one ‘subject’ told the radio station that 10 women had been arrested in the country, simply for wearing above-the-knee trousers.
At the time, a north Pyongan resident revealed that two women had been fined for smoking outside while they ate and were warned that if they were caught again, they could be imprisoned at a disciplinary labour centre for a month.
In Japan, authority figures have long imposed strict regulations on what school students can wear - down to the colour of their underwear, the length of their socks and even hairstyles.
Girls are banned from wearing their hair in ponytails as it’s thought, bizarrely, that exposing the nape of their necks could ‘sexually excite’ male students.
Some schools are so tough on the latter that they demand photographic proof from students of their natural hair colour and texture, if it isn’t strictly black and straight.
I'm a bot and I'm open source!
They also banned skinny jeans in 2021 for the same reason:
https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2021/may/26/north-korea-bans-skinny-jeans
Can't keep their authoritarian bullshit going without brainwashing and extreme control of those poor Koreans.
A don doesn't wear shorts
I suppose Kim Jong Un also doesn't poop or pee? What is this article?