this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
38 points (78.8% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

18 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Spider-Man: No Way Home - The Art of the Movie book just landed on shelves worldwide, and in it, the film’s director, Jon Watts, confirmed what audiences always suspected about the ending of the movie: it ends at the beginning.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArtificialLink@yall.theatl.social 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Were people actually confused by the ending? It seemed pretty obvious.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Go to any forum for a TV show after an episode. The amount of obvious things people get confused by is soul shattering. You will lose faith in humanity.

So, I'm not surprised if stupid people were confused by the ending. Unfortunately.

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Sadly enough, the "cinema sins" YouTube channel is pretty representative of how dumb and inattentive the average viewer is.

[–] TommySalami@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's honestly wild, and ranges from stuff that I can only assume is due to people playing on their phones and half-watching, to a level of ignorance about storytelling that basically requires the plot being exposition dumped for them to grasp it. I genuinely don't get it, and it can make recommending good shows/movies difficult.

[–] Flowmango@artemis.camp 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For some things yeah I can see that. For the MCU, I disagree. There are so many different plot lines and characters and this hovering idea about where different phases are leading. I don’t blame a casual or even Uber fan viewer for not fully trusting or understanding what a given MCU movie’s ending will mean going forward.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You don't need to have seen any other movies to understand that nobody knows who Peter Parker is at the end of No Way Home. It's the catalyst for the entire movie.

[–] Flowmango@artemis.camp 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think we’re talking about two different things. The point of OP’s post was the Director sharing thoughts about this being the origin story conclusion for MCU Spiderman. That’s not something we saw in the movie itself. Yep… we saw the part where no one knows who Peter is. We didn’t see the part where the Director talked about what it means in general for MCU spiderman.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

He's in high school the entire trilogy. Of course it's an origin story. This stuff isn't even worth debating over it's so simple.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Have to remember that a lot of people are pretty casual about their super hero movies, and each is in a mental vacuum from the others. I could see people not thinking about it that much.

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't get it. Didn't the movie end with Peter becoming anonymous resulting in him having to start over?

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, basically - everyone has forgotten who spider man is, so it's like all the avenger stuff and the other arcs never happened.

[–] r2vq@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Everyone forgot who Peter Parker is. They all still remember Spider-man.

[–] quicken@aussie.zone 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just saw it as an easy way for everyone to move on from contract obligations. No commitment to keeping a Sony and Disney partnership. No commitment to keeping any of the actors. I don't think we'll see another Tom Holland spider man. I don't think we'll see another MCU spider man.

[–] There1snospoon7491@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Disney would be in-fucking-sane to let go of an MCU Spidey. It would be like having X-men without Professor X, or removing some other staple hero. Spidey is far and away one of the most valuable singular heroes in the Marvel Universe, alongside Iron Man, Cap, and perhaps Wolverine, and each of those only truly became MASSIVELY popular after the movies. Spidey was already a juggernaut before that, in the comics world, and the Maguire movies.

No way do we not get another MCU spidey, whether it’s Holland or not.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 year ago

Except that Disney doesn't control Spiderman, Sony does.

Disney will probably make do without Spiderman, especially now as it can tap into the movie rights that Fox had.

[–] Penguinblue@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn't it Sony wanting a reset in case no agreement was reached with Disney so they had free reign to take the story wherever that wanted?

[–] VM_Abrantes@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I was under the impression that after the success of Spider verse that Sony was going to invest more in Miles Morales than Peter Parker and that the MCU can keep doing what it's doing.