Trees

6741 readers

55 users here now

A community centered around cannabis.

In the spirit of making Trees a welcoming and uplifting place for everyone, please follow our Commandments.

Be Cool.
I'm not kidding. Be nice to each other.
Avoid low-effort posts

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

CM400@lemmy.world

LegionEris@feddit.nl

bizzle@lemmy.world

TerpChasersClub@lemmy.world

New Legal High, What is RAF? (notforhuman.org)

submitted 1 year ago by TheBiGuy@reddthat.com to c/trees@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I recently went to the CBD shop of my choice "High Society" and they offered me a new product called RAF Weed. Zero information in store or even on the packaging.

The German website also lacks a real explanation. After some digging around, I found some French articles discussing it. It seems like RAF is a derivative of HHC. According to high society, it is:

"Stronger and more intense than CBD, RAF - which stands for Rapid Absorption Formula - is aimed at the more initiated THC users and former users." (translated)

It was sold to me as "CBD" and overall I was unhappy with the lack of information I was given, considering even HHC is still very much an unregulated minefield of shitty weed and shady sellers.

As there is almost no Information on RAF apart from french articles, I just wanted to warn you guys to stay safe and take care. ;)

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Found some more info. It'll get you high, but looks pretty dangerous.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah I heard that many died coming down

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Idk, sounds like some new version of spice/k2/synthetic THC.

[–] SyJ@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So is the warning to stay away from this?

[–] TheBiGuy@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Well, depends on how much risk your willing to take. New drugs might be ok but sideeffects are just little known

[–] kaklerbitmap@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Wild that politicians and pearl clutchers still think all this prohibition BS is necessary (or effective). Sorry you're in that boat dude hopefully the laws eventually catch up.