this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2022
9 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31975 readers
1083 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Helix@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

Should include LineageOS 19 in the title

[–] poVoq@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which means my perfectly functional device on Kernel 3.18 will soon be obsolete when they drop security updates for LinageOS 18.1 😰

I guess my next Phone will be really a PinePhone Pro... so sick of this planned obsolence of perfectly good hardware.

[–] kixik@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

well, that's my plan as well, however I'm missing mobile versions of apps, soe far only available for desktop, since the from factor is different, I guess the gui should be different as well. The best would be using at lest Qt apps, which might work on mobile... BTW, although I don't like flatpack, I'll have to start using I'd guess, if moving to gnu+linux phones. I do like the fact what comes with pinephones now a days is manjaro with plasma mobile.

I guess I can get used to some non mobile apps working on a phone, but I maintained my family's phones with lineageOSforMicroG, no gpapps installed, and mostly using f-droid, except for few apps without alternatives (including whatsapp, which my mom and sister can't get rid of), so I don't see how I can keep them up to date with current good old xiaomi redmi 4x (which by the way are pretty comfortable, like 4.5 inches, which are easy on short hands).

Although lineageOS is opensource, it depends on a bunch on non free proprietary stuff, which gets stuck on old linux versions. And as mainstream is google, there's nothing good to be expected about not breaking old devices. Moreover, where it reads "iptables can’t be restored in any meaningful way", it means upstream (yeah, google) purposely broke it so bad, that it almost looks like that breaking devices stuck at old linux versions was their intention. Iptables keep working fine on Today's 5.17.4, on any gnu+linux desktop distro, so there's no reason to break it, just because of using newer linux versions. Ohh well ! Sad times, specially when depending on corporates provided stuff...

[–] saint@group.lt 1 points 2 years ago

Interesting..

[–] angarabebesi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

What's wrong with IPTables? It just works.

[–] Helix@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Here might be an answer for you: https://cilium.io/blog/2018/04/17/why-is-the-kernel-community-replacing-iptables

I also wonder why the replaced iptables with eBPF and not nftables.

[–] linzilla@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

don't want to sound cynical