this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
172 points (96.7% liked)

UK Politics

3073 readers
211 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mackwinston@feddit.uk 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"Have become"? They were always this mean. The article doesn't seem to have a comparison between this survey and an earlier one showing that Britons have become this way, and I rather suspect this meanness has always been the way.

[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it is hard for a British news outlet to give their readers a reality check and bash them all in one go without some offramp. The amount of people who would thank for a wake uo call like that is much smaller than the group of conservatives snowflakes who can not deal with criticism and would be enraged.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

It also frames it as something that you can easily change. If it was "always have been" people would be more likely to shrug and say "whelp, seems we will never change". Kind of reminds me of how they frame climate change stuff now.

[–] mobyduck648@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

I don’t think you can generalise that broadly. Yes we’re a country of crabs in a bucket, nosy curtain-twitchers, and insufferable village scolds but we’re also a country that gives generously to charity, still fundamentally believes in democracy and the rule of law despite everything that’s happened, and apparently we poll among the least racist and homophobic countries in Europe which is nice.

No nationality is a hive mind, we’re not inherently good people or bad people we’re just people. I think we should be looking to tackle our crab bucket mentality but we can’t do that if we think that mentality is something intrinsically part of us rather than something we can choose to reject.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A full quarter of our society thinking that the people out of work shouldn't be able to afford food or heating is a grim fucking indictment on what we've become. What kind of utter ghoul do you have to be to believe, "If you're unable to work thanks to a disability and don't have someone that can care for you, you should just freeze or starve, whichever gets you first"?

[–] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

A full quarter of our society thinking that the people out of work shouldn't be able to afford food or heating

For these people perhaps we should present a modest proposal.

[–] Tammo-Korsai@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

A decade of anti-benefits rhetoric and squeezes on living standards has fostered the belief that people on social security and low wages deserve a life of penury and boredom.

And death. Benefit sanctions have killed people by finishing off those with serious medical issues through sheer stress or driving others to suicide.

[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 18 points 1 year ago

This is the same meanness in the population that gave us Brexit.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The faster you get rid of the Tories, the faster that feeling will go away.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Getting them out will help (on every front) but we are still subjected to propaganda from the Tory press that promotes the agendas that suit billionaires, not ordinary people. They can't rule us until they first divide us.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Tories are akin to US Republicans right, or do I misunderstand the nuances of the UK political factions?

[–] Goms@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sort of.

American politics are so far to the right that the comparison isn't really... Sane.

Like Bernie Sanders is considered a radical left there, whilst here he's probably (I haven't checked out his policies since 2016) he's more centrist, with a left lean iirc

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Is he though? I think that's mostly media spin, a lot of people supported him and the DNC chair had all but admitted (maybe she has, I don't follow super close) to sabotaging him.

He had some pretty wild socialist dreams, that I am sure he buried and held a funeral for after Trumps election. If I remember right there was some literature about incentivizing ownership of capital by the workers through tax incentives. Essentially kind of making workers automatically small shareholders, sounded cool if I understood it correctly. Was a long time ago... dudes been at it forever.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

It's always tricky trying for an equivalent as US politics are more right wing. So the hardest right Tories are probably in Trump territory and the moderate wing of the Conservative party is more like parts of the Democrats. Bernie Sanders would probably fall somewhere centre-left in the Labour Party. Corbyn would have been burned at the stake over there.

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

There are ties between both groups. There was a conference that was paid for by republican linked groups about 2 months ago. UK conservatives share the same agendas as republicans. They learn from each others mistake to become more effective in their grab for power.

[–] Tammo-Korsai@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

They won't be gotten rid of because the Tories know how to make working class feel middle class, thus they vote against their own interests every time. It's amazing what monthly payments for a BMW or whatever else makes a person feel accomplished.

[–] Biohazard@feddit.uk 15 points 1 year ago

We are watching our high trust society crumble around us.

[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Social Darwinism is heartless and cruel af

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As I said elsewhere, it reminded me of Lula's speech about how the poor deserve to live a nice life, too.

'They think that the poor don’t have rights. … The right to barbecue with family on the weekend, to buy a little picanha, to that piece of picanha with the fat dipped in flour, and to a glass of cold beer.'

EDIT: Re-added the quote. Markup ate it before.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Picanha = rump steak, one of the finer meats for a barbecue. I do think the flour in case was farofa, which isn't quite flour, but a mix that's ready to eat.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Oddly, I've never been able to find the original Portuguese quotation, but I assume he did say farofa!

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Just 39% thought everyone – the wealthiest, average earners, those on the minimum wage, and benefits claimants – should be able to pursue a non-active hobby, with only 27% believing those on any income should have the chance to go out socialising.

The cost of living crisis has seen disposable income inequality in Britain rise, with the poorest fifth of the population enduring the biggest fall as they’re forced to spend more to cover the basics.

A decade of anti-benefits rhetoric and squeezes on living standards has fostered the belief that people on social security and low wages deserve a life of penury and boredom.

It creates a demand for ever more absurd conditions in order for critics to acknowledge hardship; until a mum with multiple sclerosis has to spend her evenings staring at a blank wall eating porridge to deserve disability benefits.

In a country where it’s now normalised for a home, access to basic utilities and regular meals to be out of reach for many, it’s easy to become convinced that hobbies and entertainment are unreasonable requests.

In The Road to Wigan Pier, George Orwell wrote of the working class: “Would it not be better if they spent more money on wholesome things like oranges and … saved on fuel and ate their carrots raw?


I'm a bot and I'm open source!