Stable Diffusion

4255 readers

23 users here now

Discuss matters related to our favourite AI Art generation technology

Also see

Other communities

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Does onyone have experience with ComfyUI? (lm.ainyataovi.net)

submitted 1 year ago by Shiimiish@lm.ainyataovi.net to c/stable_diffusion@lemmy.dbzer0.com

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi there, I've seen a few videos on yt showing it off and it looks incredibly powerful in finetuning the outputs of SD. It also looks dauntingly complicated to learn how to use it effectively.

For those of you, who played around with it - do you think it gives better results than A1111? Is it indeed better in finetuning? How steep was the learning curve for you?

I'm trying to figure out if I'd want to put in hours to learn how to use it. If it improves my ability to get out exactly the images I want, I'll go for it. If it does what A1111 does, just dressed up differently I'll sit it out :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] noorbeast@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

By faster I mean in rendering and less demanding on hardware, so I mean ComfyUI seems way more efficient.

In terms of the node based approach what it does allow is fine grained and even custom node control, but as I said, if that is not your thing then ComfyBox provides a 'best of both worlds' option.

My advice is to do what I am currently doing, try ComfyUI, see how it compares for your particular use case or workflow, then decide from there. Personally I am keeping both Automatic 1111 and ComfyUI, sharing the key resources between both, while I make up my mind: https://weirdwonderfulai.art/resources/sd-automatic1111-webui-customisation-tips/

You can use a json file or ComfyUI gerated image and just drag it on to the interface to setup a partcular node structure, so in that respect ComfyUI is even quicker than Automatic 1111, but that said both pretty much have that functionality.