this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)
Linux Gaming
15902 readers
71 users here now
Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.
Recommended news sources:
Related chat:
Related Communities:
Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Since I began exploring Linux again for the first time in 20 years, I've tried a handful of distros. I'm... semi competent working in the command line, and here are my experiences.
Pop!_OS: comes with proprietary drivers for Nvidia cards! Neat! Some minor compositor issues with Nvidia and multi monitor support, but I hammered them out. Eventually the general glitchyness of the desktop environment and software center turned me off.
Fedora KDE: getting my laptop to handle multi monitor support, while still allowing high refresh gaming on the external monitor was a no go. I managed to install drivers from the command line, but Optimus, used to select power profiles and allow one monitor to have hardware acceleration while the laptop screen itself runs off the processor, would not function no matter what I did.
Nobara: hmmm. Fedora, but the aforementioned driver issues are solved out of the box, neat. But I hated the gnome based custom DE. they have other DE spins like KDE but I didn't try them.
Manjaro: Arch, but easier? It was pretty smooth, but too complicated for my tastes.
Linux Mint Cinnamon: Mint just fucking works. A graphical driver manager that automatically detects my GPU and lets me click what driver I want to use with no bullshit? Multi monitor support was easy. Gaming is easy. The software center is clean and smooth. No glitchyness anywhere. Cinnamon is beautiful and easy enough to customize if you want to rice it out. Mint isn't as sexy or interesting as some other distros, in fact it works so well for someone with slightly lower than intermediate Linux chops, that it's almost boring.
My vote is, try a few. But in the end, mint seems like where I'll come home to whenever the distro hop itch strikes again.
IMO one should never recommend manjaro. To suggest an easy arch endeavouros should be the way to go, why? Because the manjaro devs make way too many mistakes and a mistake or two can happen to anyone, but when it happens often it becomes a pattern, one where I wouldn't want someone to deal with if it can be avoided.
Yeah, I had seen some of the criticism but figured it wouldn't hurt to give it a whirl. I haven't tried endeavor yet, maybe I should.
Definitely try it. I started Linux with Mint since it's the closest to Windows I could find. Later on I wanted to try bleeding edge but vanilla Arch was too complicated for a noob like me. Until I found EOS. The transition was smooth and painless. I learned more about Linux in a few months with EOS than years on Mint, but that's a me problem. Now I have vanilla Arch on my VM and EOS on my laptop bare metal. It's pretty stable, and that one-time Grub issue was the only hiccup I ever experienced that was not due to my stupidity. Lol.
Now I want to try Gentoo, but man it's even more complicated.
Thanks for the encouragement! I've been reading up and thinking about making it my project for the weekend. The question still lingers, do I need sexy Linux, when regular boring functional Linux does everything I need it to very smoothly? I game browse the web on it. I don't code or make content, and my day job keeps me so busy that I want my shit to just work when I feel like booting up a game my steamdeck or switch can't handle. Is the feeling of running it successfully worth it?