this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2023
123 points (89.7% liked)

World News

32297 readers
800 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“We believe the prerequisite for meaningful diplomacy and real peace is a stronger Ukraine, capable of deterring and defending against any future aggression,” Blinken said in a speech in Finland, which recently became NATO’s newest member and shares a long border with Russia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheBelgian@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a belgian and therefore european, I disagree. US is making war by proxy here and WE are paying the price.

I am not for war but I have nothing to justify an irreducible support to Ukraine and interference with Russia.

NOPE

[–] Tretiak@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Agreed. This situation is far more complicated than the western mainstream media wants to convince people it is. This wasn't a conflict that was born at the outset of war. There's a reason why there's 'zero' mention of things like the Minsk Accords or any considerations given to Eurasian security arrangements. Here's an excellent primer on the background involved. I'm not at all trying to say what Russia did was justified, but they've got far more of a moral plateau to stand on than the US does.

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then you are morally okay with Ukraine being wiped off the map and the murder of as many of its citizen as Putin's army can manage.

[–] Tretiak@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Dude, do you honestly think Putin is trying to militarily annihilate Ukraine? Especially when he considers Russians and Ukrainians to share the same cultural lineage and history. He made numerous overtures to try and 'avoid' a conflict from breaking out. Why was the west so adamantly against laying the framework for a security arrangement that made sense for all the parties involved?

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He made numerous overtures to try and ‘avoid’ a conflict from breaking out.

Putin: "If you allow this country to have protection from me invading it, I'm going to invade it."
U.S.: "Yeah... we're going to consider allowing them protection from you."
Putin: "Oh no... somebody stop me from invading this other country...! Here I go, I'm gonna invaaaade..."
U.S.: "Okay."
[Putin invades Ukraine, begins murdering Ukrainians]
U.S., months later: "Alright that's enough, we're going to help these Ukranians to keep you from murdering them."
Putin and his sheep: "tHe U.S. iS wArMoNgErInG!!!1!!"

[–] Tretiak@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What do you think the Minsk Accords were?

[–] JasBC@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Non-binding treaties negotiated under duress that all fell apart the moment the ink was put to paper, through which Russia tried to control Ukrainian internal affairs?

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Further acquiescence to a terrorist country's demands?

[–] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that what we arw calling a peace treaty Ukraine violated that garanteed the righta of the Russian speaking minority of Ukrainians in donbas?

[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I honestly don't give a shit. Russia is the aggressor who invaded and massacred untold Ukrainians along the way. They now should be opposed and driven back until they come to their senses and leave, or are beaten into the dust so that they can no longer pose a threat.

If you want to debate the entire history of the region, take it to someone who does give a shit.

[–] Tretiak@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“I have strong opinions about something I don’t know shit about!”

[–] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do not think I have heard a better summation of the liberal point of view on this topic. Though I would add a very infront of the strong

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

How about "war and people dying is bad, but..."

[–] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Quick question, how can Russia be the agressor, when they were not the party to break the previous treaty? How could Russia be the agressor when they only entered after their allies, the LPR and DPR, newly formed after a vote of the people due to the violation of the aformentioned Minsk Accords, asked for help from their ally. Russia never took the first step, and its quite hard to be the agressor when, you where not the one agressing