this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
47 points (96.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54566 readers
763 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
47
Pirating AI models (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 

So it is convenient and all to use chatGPT from open AI site and to use other AI models on their official sites, but doesn't feel like a pirate when doing this am I wrong? like OpenAI staff spying on my discussion with my waifu persona I given to ChatGPT, or Midjourney creators knowing about every picture of John Oliver I created with their discord bot, Also you are only allowed to use chatGPT 3.5 and need to pay for GPT 4 (20$ a month for a limited use wtf) so are there any islands where the pirate can do what he does comfortably?

there are Telegram bots. Also Quora suggests multiple AI models on https://poe.com/ . but I'm curious if there exists some compilation of pirated useful AI tools

EDIT: Thank you everyone from inside and outside this instance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only thing you can "pirate" is LLaMA, and it's not really piracy you can just grab it from HuggingFace on the honor system. Check out GPT4All or oogabooga, which will both give you nice web interfaces to selfhosted LLMs.

You'll need some beefy hardware to get responses comparable to the commercially available models, but it is possible—if impractical.

[–] blake@monero.town 1 points 1 year ago

yes LLaMA got leaked and has opened up a tool for the people. I see the project openLLaMA making headway in putting out a chatbot 'for the people' as opposed to the centralised control. don't confuse it with LLaMA 2, a confab between mta and mcrosoft which is 'open source' but you have to let them have all of your data. seems to be an effort at damage control and to try and still harvest some of the data that people are shovelling into machine learning programs these days. I personally don't think they're great at all, far from intelligent and I think they're going to be bad for humanity down the line. but pandora's box is open so we might as well democratise by at least breaking the corporate chokehold on A"I".