this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

RPG

3919 readers
1 users here now

Discussion of table top roleplaying games.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just joined Lemmy today and found this community. Any Shadowrun players/GMs here? Been playing SR5 on and off for quite a few years, and just started a new campaign. Very excited to get it off the ground.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emberleaf@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I absolutely love the setting of Shadowrun, but have never had the opportunity to play. As for running a game myself, I've heard a lot of horror stories about how crunchy and complicated the system is, and that has been enough to keep me from trying to run a game myself. :P

[–] Barbarian@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The rulebook is absolutely atrocious. Absolute garbage formatting that forces you to look in 5 different places for anything.

Once you get a basic handle on the game though, it flows really well, especially for a more trenchcoat style with lots of background plot and mysteries to uncover. The lore is what keeps me coming back more than anything else though.

However, there's 3 aspects of the rules that I consider very crunchy and clunky, and I houserule:

  1. Grenades in enclosed spaces. Nobody has time to sit there and do linear algebra to figure out how many times the shockwaves bounces between two walls doing damage each pass. If you throw a grenade into an enclosed space, chunky salsa and we move on with our lives.

  2. Non-combat decking. If you need to hack the system while your party is being attacked by enemies, that's a cool combat encounter for everyone. If you want to get the floor plans of the building during legwork, I'm not having the decker run a solo session getting the data while everyone else stares at their phones. I make the decker roll a computers + logic test, give them info depending on successes, and we all move on.

  3. Certain spells are absolutely horrendous in terms of how they affect the game. The 2 worst offenders are mob mind and chaos. Mob mind because you roll resistances for every single goddamn person in the area. I just make a very rough average of a nornal civvie, and houserule that the more excess successes you have the more people "failed" the save. Chaos has no written spell effect. I made my own table, with random effects ranging from fire to input failure to software glitch and lots of other possibilities. Keeps things fresh.

Jeez, that turned into way more of a wall of text than I intended, sorry.

[–] FrozenAzer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

It funny, the system has never really felt very crunchy to me but as I was riding your comment I was thinking about it and yes it does have a bit of crunch to it. That said, it's always smoothly for me and I quite like it as a system.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm a fan of running the world in another system, myself :p

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same. I've gone so far as to buy sources (5th edition) and tried running it once, but holy damn that crunch will break your teeth. I did support & enjoy the Shadowrun Returns trilogy of video games that came out a while back, and highly recommend it.

[–] Emberleaf@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've toyed with the idea of converting Shadowrun to Monte Cook's Cypher System. Wonder how that might work... strokes beard

[–] Oiselarius@dice.camp 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Emberleaf@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ooh, nice! You'll have to let me know how it works out!