this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2023
165 points (91.5% liked)

Reddit

13591 readers
3 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I usually don't get too salty about these things, but that seemed uncalled for, especially since I'm on their side.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] marco@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[โ€“] pitninja@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe the difference is the fact that Dessalines is directly involved in the Lemmy project. Maybe that makes it self promotion in the Apollo dev's eyes? ๐Ÿคท

[โ€“] catacomb@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't understand people's issue with self-promotion. If it's unhelpful, i.e. spam? Sure, nobody wants to try something completely irrelevant or broken. That's because it's irrelevant or broken.

If you've put a lot of work into something, especially for free, which solves someone's problem; I think you have every right to shout it from the roof tops?

It's not like anyone was spamming about Lemmy before people had an issue with Reddit. I had to go hunting to find it months ago.

[โ€“] zekiz@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem when you allow this is that sooner or later the sub is only self promotion and you can't find anything relevant anymore.

[โ€“] catacomb@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, maybe it's difficult to enforce with nuance and not have people get angry about it.

I have found some great projects through self-promotion and I haven't had to moderate it so I might have a soft spot for it.

[โ€“] orclev@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No self promotion is a very simple quality filter. Pretty much everyone is proud of something they made, but finding someone else that also is willing to promote it is much harder. By blocking self promotion they're setting a low bar that needs to be cleared where you have to find someone else to vouch for you. That said, once at least one other person has posted about it you should be allowed to post as well since you've effectively cleared that bar at that point.

[โ€“] Npenplz@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

People are a lot more likely to promote their own products if they're allowed to than to promote someone else's work, and it quickly becomes spammy of people talking about their own "superior" projects. I fully agree that this is great though, but I get where christain was coming from removing it from his post

[โ€“] marco@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be a little like the staff on the sinking Titanic reminding passengers not to mention other cruise lines :p

[โ€“] dessalines@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Self-promotion rules are really weird for open-source projects too. Its like we're telling people about a pizza recipe that we created and are sharing freely... we're not selling anything or trying to profit off people.

[โ€“] Alpagu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I appreciate you very much. thanks for all your Efforts

[โ€“] tux0r@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought Voat was mostly defunct now.

[โ€“] Steve@lemmy.one 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is. Shut down in 2020.

Boat is a sad story. The site itself was very good. When Reddit purged their worst subs and users, they all went to Voat. Predictably it became extremely toxic.

[โ€“] tux0r@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

That could have been avoided by establishing a counter-culture there, but it seems that this has not been tried well enough. It's still sad to see the decline of alternatives to almost every large website out there.