this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
119 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6199 readers
9 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I kimd of am, why are so many relationships in media strsight? We need more lgbt representation

This is dumb and I'm probably getting offended for no reason but here's a small experience I dealt with recently

So like 30 minutes ago my grandmother wanted me to smile so she told me to think of a pretty girl and while I didn't react at all my first thought was literally "why not pretty boys" Its silly I know.

I'm not out but I literally couldn't be leaving anymore hints that I'm bi. Its funny how nobody noticed yet

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jennifilm@beehaw.org 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It’s also absolutely incorrect and pretty well documented - 9% of adults on average globally, trending much higher for youth according to some of the most recent data from Ipsos.

But you’re absolutely right - bringing up population rates is unnecessary and kind of odd - and how many of us there are doesn’t negate how poorly we’re treated in many parts of the world, and the deficits we still face in western society.

[–] thumbtack@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago

i would assume they brought it up since being heterosexual is the norm because the majority of the population is heterosexual

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Specifically in the context of media representation, I'd say it's relevant. There is an actual objective target that we can talk about there.

Heternormativity in general, and especially in the context of interpersonal interactions, is only tangentially related to that though, and there's obviously no reason in the modern day to be oblivious to the possibility that people aren't straight.

[–] mouth_brood@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

9% in 30 countries, that's far from globally. And I would guess those countries lean liberal. I used population percentage in my original statement to refute underrepresentation. Even if I use your skewed number of 9%, I think that they are appropriately represented in media

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This shows a distinct lack of understanding of statistics and common issues in underreporting of marginalized status. The often cited example showing this is the following graph. As marginalization and stigmatization decreased, even for something which isn't a literal death sentence in many countries, the rate of left handed individuals increased. Researchers in equity, population health, and statistics all hypothesize that a similar phenomenon is happening with queer identification.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That graph... what happened in the 1900s?

[–] __chelsea__@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We stopped punishing left-handedness. As an example: children used to be taught only how to write with their right hand, and using the left hand would result in punishment -- such as the hand being hit with yardsticks or the child being verbally abused -- until the child forced themselves to write with their right hand.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

But why the dip from the pre-1900s? Was it something like "increased literacy, increased punishment, stopped punishing"?

[–] thumbtack@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

i would assume they brought it up since being heterosexual is the norm because the majority of the population is heterosexual